um pahars

14 games left : Did you realise that in the last 14 league games we have won ONCE and gained NINE points. The actual stats are : P---W---D---L---F---A---GD---Pts 14...1.....6....7...11...22...-11.....9 :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

I'm sorry, but we always get the same old promises of "the boys are up for it, they're feeling confident, we know what we have to do, we will be more effective, we will get better results" etc etc etc before matches. And then when we lose/draw, we get the same old excuses of "we were unlucky, I can't believe that result, we looked like getting a point, we didnt lose the war, we feel confident now" etc etc etc. Sorry fella, but you're just another chief talking bllocks and you need to start delivering and, 26 points from 28 games when you were a partnership with Poortvliet, and now, 2 points from 4 games on your own, just aint good enough.

As soon as the Administrator is appointed, then the current Directors will be on the outside. There's nothing to stop them throwing their hat in the ring with others, and arguably the Administrator might think they have certain advantages over others with reagrds their offer (e.g. experience and inside knowledge of the Club), but there is no way the Administrator will let them have an "inside track". I certainly wouldn't rule out Lowe throwing his hat into the ring post Administration, but that's not the same as saying the Administrator will be sharing confidential stuff with him.

Don't worry, we will come good again. And I'd like to think that coming back from adversity and some real setbacks will make us stronger both as a Club and as a supporting community. Sometimes you have to experience the absolute sht to realise what you have isn't that bad.

No problems, it's only my sense of humour that's keeping me going at the moment!!!!

I'm convinced he said he has not been productive recently. It was a part of the Solent interview which normally goes up on the BBC/Saints section after matches, so easy to verify.

"We have to score a goal, that's our problem" "We have a scoring problem" No sht sherlock, so how about explaining why you took off the only player who has looked like scoring regularly recently? When questioned, he said Saga came off because, "he has not been productive in recent games" What the fck is he on. He may not have scored against Sheff Utd, but he got 4 in the prior 3 games. If that isn't productive then I'd like to know what th fck is????? Absolutely shocking, and I'm beginning to wish we had kept Poortvliet on:smt048:smt048:rolleyes:

Just heard that as well, but have absolutely no idea of what he means, nor any confidence that there really is something around the corner.

You've really lost it here Alain:smt048:smt048:smt048:rolleyes: You're in the same boat as Professor on this one (and trust me, that's not good company) LMFAO. Mullah's, shoe bombers, inciting others, fcking hell fella you're coming across as right prck on this one. Go and have a lie down and reflect on your posts, as you're not doing yourself any favours on this one. As for my view on luck, I'm afraid I'm a rationalist: Another view holds that "luck is probability taken personally". A rationalist approach to luck includes the application of the rules of probability, and an avoidance of unscientific beliefs. The rationalist feels the belief in luck is a result of poor reasoning or wishful thinking. To a rationalist, a believer in luck commits the "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" logical fallacy, which argues that because two events are connected sequentially, they are connected causally as well: A happens (luck-attracting event or action) and then B happens; Therefore, A caused B. In this particular perspective, probability is only affected by confirmed causal connections. A brick falling on a person walking below, therefore, is not a function of that person's luck, but is instead the result of a collection of understood (or explainable) occurrences. Statistically, every person walking near the building was just as likely to have the brick fall on them. The gambler's fallacy and inverse gambler's fallacy both explain some reasoning problems in common beliefs in luck. They involve denying the unpredictability of random events: "I haven't rolled a seven all week, so I'll definitely roll one tonight". Luck is merely an expression noting an extended period of noted outcomes, completely consistent with random walk probability theory. Wishing one "good luck" will not cause such an extended period, but it expresses positive feelings toward the one -- not necessarily wholly undesirable.

Seriously Alain, you've lost it with this post:smt048:smt048:smt048 Go and have a lie down;)

Forget muffins, you owe me

Totally agree, although as ling as we have a chance then other results do matter. But as you say, it all counts for nothing if we can't win (particularly at home).

And even better that Norwich are losing, particularly as we have a game in hand on them.

Yeah, but one goal can always be pegged back. Just noticed who Charlton are playing next week, Barnsley away!!!!!!!! Arguably we could do with a draw or them winning to stop Barnsley pulling away!!!!!!

Phew!!! I would argue we need to keep Charlton below us as I think we'll have enough trouble overhauling two teams, let alone three!!!!!! Then again Plymouth are on a mare, but then again their 7/8 points advantage could be too much to claw back. We could be bottom come next week:cool:

And I'm as guilty as you are my friend. Like you, I gave the team all my support at every match I have been to this season, cheering them on and singing at every opportunity. However, for about 15 mins towards the end of that Doncaster game, my support was diverted away from supporting to the team, and towards having a pop at those in charge. If we go down, it is obviously down to people like you and I.:rolleyes:

Plus if it stays like this, Charlton will be a win away from overtaking us, (assuming we lose the next tiome Charlton win).

Norwich losing is good news. Barnsley can't pull away cos not playing (they will have two games in hand though). Same for Watford, who will have two games in hand. Doncaster winning pulls them away further. Forest drawing (but away at Brum will be tough). If it stays like this, then it's another bad day at the office, however, scarpping a draw could be seen as OK.

TBF Barnsley having two games in hand is no sign of us being totally fcked. Given their current return they'd be lucky to get 2 points from those games. That said, we cant keep on losing!!!!!!!!!

I McIndoe playing today??? Did Davis pshyce him out??? I would have thougt maynbard would have taken it

he'll save thi sone just as he saved fromt hem ealrier in the season

A Valentine's Day massacre would be more appropriate.

And we're getting slaughtered!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Lowe, the management team, the strategy, all of it is taking a severe battering on Soccer Saturday. All four pundits think we're going down. (Plus Wotte has just come out with his line of Lowe wasn;t here two years ago, again!!!!).

Irony is obviously lost on you:rolleyes::rolleyes: I've got but one word for you: Go and have a look at TT's posts before you gob off and make yourself look even more of a fool than most of us already take you for. HTH