um pahars
Members-
Posts
6,510 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by um pahars
-
I'm bored, so I'll have a look in ITN later on, but I would concur with thay view. May be wrong, but also think they regularly beat us back then (they did have a decent side mind).
-
Way off topic, but are you sure about your statement above??? Obviously the total in the bucket at the end is vitally important, but I would argue that just as important in a more holistic manner is where the donation came from. A ruthless, exploitative, criminal minded individual could donate £1million easily from his ill gotten gains, but I would venture that £1million donated from a wide number of poorer, humbler and more honest folk would have the better all round benefit to society. "For it is in giving that we receive". "You can give without loving, but you can never love without giving."
-
It was still up there last season when I was on a corporate day, very nice touch by Lowe may I add.
-
Hopefully tonight's results might fire us up!!! Would still go a bit tighter though and play Chaplow or Spiderman over Guly.
-
He's just told Jeff Shreeves of SKY: "I'm not feeling good mentally"
-
Just seen the Palace goals and they were pretty well worked, they were strolling past Brighton (6 goals conceded in last 2 games)
-
What's more important ? The furture of SFC or its past ?
um pahars replied to alpine_saint's topic in The Saints
Maybe you can answer this one as everyone else I've asked have failed to do so. What does having an agenda mean and what is this agenda? -
Would take a draw away against a tough team, havign seen our rivals slip up at home.
-
Shocking, what has this game come to????
-
Fook me!!!!!!!!! I now have to go back up the hospital as i have split my stitches!!!!!!!!!! 90+5 and a ******* Own Goal LMFAO
-
I just hurt myself!!!!!!! Gave a decent shout out and might have opened my stitches. Both Brighton and West Ham losing at home, Derby & Hull drawing. Stay top without even playing
-
Also just noticed Donny had pulled it back against Hull. Fingers crossed it stays like this as a pretty decent set of results
-
There should have been a huge frowny face after my post as Adrian Heath still rankles me to this day!!!!
-
A Palace goal would be wonderful. Eagles eat Seagulls
-
What's more important ? The furture of SFC or its past ?
um pahars replied to alpine_saint's topic in The Saints
Indeed Ewell, but sadly it seems that some find that so difficult to understand. And it's also a very lazy way of debating, or alternatively a mask for those who cannot offer up a coherent response. -
With some goals more weighted than others (of course I'm not bitter 27 years on!!!!!!!!!)
-
He's breastfeeding!!!!!
-
Was the original sung by Rangers fans about Sandy Clark coming down from Airdrie???
-
If this story has legs and if he has the appetite and if the manager thinks his attitude is right and that Beattie could do a job, then why not. More than happy to accept NA's judgement, (and a little part of me would just love to see the odd glimpse of the old James Beattie). Cupping his hand to his ear still gives me a smile to this day.
-
What's more important ? The furture of SFC or its past ?
um pahars replied to alpine_saint's topic in The Saints
-
Struggling a little in the games I have seen him, but hasn't been helped by either being part of a makeshift back four or having a new partner alongside him. To be honest I think he's easily good enough for this division and just adjusting to the step up, as think last couple of seasons have been a doddle for a player of his ability. Also think he could hack it in the top flight (but would need support from another strong player).
-
What's more important ? The furture of SFC or its past ?
um pahars replied to alpine_saint's topic in The Saints
It's also somewhat unhealthy!!!! -
What's more important ? The furture of SFC or its past ?
um pahars replied to alpine_saint's topic in The Saints
Some people obviously struggle with the concept of judging decisions on their individual merits and find it impossible to believe you can be very supportive of the overall thrust/direction of something, whilst at the same time having concerns regarding certain specific issues (and those specifics don't have to invalidate the whole plan, nor make you anti the whole plan, nor bring the whole plan in to question, nor be enough to railroad the plan, ad nauseum). The last time I checked we hadn't all signed up to some kind of Cabinet Collective Responsibility when we bought our season tickets. -
I think one was the sub who hadn't come on, another after the game had ended plus the manager!!!!!!! There's a great twitter thread on it under @BathCaty or something giving a commentary of the game.
