Weston Super Saint

.

Never played call of duty. Have eaten pizza though. Does your Rory Stewart opinion include : "They took 16,000 contractors out of the the country overnight and no-one noticed until the morning!" "They disabled ALL the planes before they left" (what about) "the Afghan women teaching in schools that are expected to fight against the Taliban" (what about) "there hasn't been a single casualty since 2018" - although we've already covered the 'ceasefire' since the withdrawal was agreed - "therefore there is zero risk" "this has not been a costly mission since 2014" And some whataboutery about North and South Korea thrown in for good measure.

How would you know that if you aren't also 'him' as clicking on a profile no longer tells you if a poster is banned? I think you're mixing your multi accounts up as collinsthedick was b-anned.

Ah, I see, other atrocities around the world simply aren't valid because of 'what about'. Good news though, when 'another dirty bomb is set off in London' as you've claimed, it won't get a mention as it will be 'whataboutery'.

Good that you try and put words in my mouth as that's not what I said at all. Surely the hypocrisy lies in virtue signalling one atrocity over another because the other is being commited by a 'bigger' country with more guns?

There have been plenty of other emotional stories, especially in China : Uighur Genocide I guess it doesn't warrant any attention though as no-one is going to invade China and put a stop to it.

At no point have I defended the Taliban. For the record, I don't condone what they do and how they do it. I do defend the right of an independent country to govern itself independently. If they want to enact Sharia Law, as they have historically done for hundreds of years, then they are perfectly entitled to do so! It makes absolutely no difference whether I agree with Sharia Law or not (again, for the record, I don't agree with it) as what they do in their own country is entirely their own business. Exactly the same as Qatar who have very similar laws, as do many other countries in Africa and Asia, yet we seem more than happy to let them govern themselves with many Westerners supporting them through tourism. Just seems hypocritical to say that Afghanistan shouldn't be allowed to enact their own laws whilst completely ignoring the multitude of other countries who have the same system!

Saintsweb transfer rumour rule number 4 - If a Saints player looking for a move out of the club says he is injured then he is definitely faking it to force a move, the lying prick. If a player from another club that we may be interested in says they are injured, they are definitely injured and therefore a useless pile of shit.

Probably because....

Beautiful example of religious intolerance and racial stereotyping. The punishment for 'zina' is stoning rather than beheading, but hey, they follow a different religion and have different laws to us so they must all be uneducated heathens who go round chopping heads off left, right and centre right?

There was a piece on the news last night about Royal Wootton Bassett and remembering all the fallen soldiers, the ones you've clearly stated have been forgotten. Now you say that of course they haven't been forgotten. We'll put this down to 'more shit Warriorsaint has made up to try and goad a reaction' shall we?

Why have you forgotten the troops?

Like Prince Andrew and all the charities he heads up, but shags an underage girl a couple of times, so gets a free pass?

To borrow a phrase from another poster, give your head a wobble

Yes. Afghanistan will revert back to tribal areas with tribal leaders over the next 12 months is my prediction.

Lol. This has aged well

I would say that right here, right now, the chance of a terrorist attack is less likely, although you only seem to conflate terrorist attacks with attacks on the UK. This handy timeline might show you that terrorism is a global problem : https://since911.com/explore/terrorism-timeline You might also notice (maybe, maybe not), that the majority of terrorist attacks in the last 40 years have happend DURING THE 20 YEARS THAT THE WEST OCCUPIED AFGHANISTAN, which kind of smacks in the face of your claim that the world is a safer place whilst foreign troops are stationed there and that's why we should send all the soldiers back! As for your tolerance of different views, your posts on here today suggest you cannot tolerate another country having a different culture, religion or set of values to those that you hold!

Excellent, looks like you have your definition! Where was the bit where I made light of it?

Why? It was you who mentioned it. You define it, then show how I have made light of it.

More random thinking! Isis / Isil have been around since before the occupation of Afghanistan and have literally only existed during that time (plus a couple of years). Was there ever a stated intention to rid the world of their existence? Have they gone away? Whilst it's clear you would love all those who don't agree with your ideals, philosophies and religion to disappear off the face of the Earth, no, they haven't 'gone away'. Is the threat still there, absolutely. Will the threat be there in the future, yep. Whilst different religions exist and religious people consider their religion to be better than someone else's then there will always be a threat from extremists. Quite how you plan to rid the planet of radical extremists will be very entertaining to hear.

Excellent. In what way have I made light of mental health?

D & C police seem happy with the evidence....

Sadly I think this persona isn't working. You're equating the Nazis (Germans) invading Poland (and a fair bit more of Europe) with the goal of taking over the continent, with the Taliban who were born and raised in Afghanistan, taking (temporary) control of their own country. Then you claim that is logical Genuinely, your posts from this morning make you look like a paranoid schizophrenic. I hope you have the support network in place that you need.

Which is exactly what is being planned in Afghanistan at the moment. The Taliban have allegedly taken 'temporary' control whilst the country is re-organised back to the tribal areas with their own 'capital' cities.

Let's be clear, for NATO to stay in Afghanistan imposing Western ways and culture on a nation that clearly knows no better (), involves more than just a financial cost. The Taliban has been 'quiet' during the past 18 months and the death toll has reduced virtually to nothing precisely BECAUSE the West agreed to withdraw its troops. Had that agreement not been forthcoming, the Taliban would have continued to kill NATO troops in the same way it had for the previous 18 years. How many more lives should have been wasted trying to impose our Western culture on a country that doesn't want it? What value do you place on each life lost in our never ending occupation of a country that doesn't want us there (I know you struggle sometimes, so I'll point out you don't need to answer that one as we all know how much value you place on the people you insist should stay and keep the natives under control ad infinitum). Incredible on so many subjects you miss so much.