Weston Super Saint

I love the way that they "will need part of sub station land" and gloss over it as if it will be gifted to them no questions asked - even if they do get it, there are still some pretty scary access issues in that corner according to the sketch... I'm sure Trousers will be along any minute now to show us who still owns the 'sub station land'....

Not sure that any option that gives the HoC ANOTHER vote is a good idea!

£1.36m losses on the day they go to Wembley - deja vu anyone? What odds on the players not getting paid for today's performance? Just need Eisner to be arrested for drug trafficking and or gun running and the circle will be complete

Were there any that showed a leave majority in the run up to the referendum - I may be mistaken but I'm pretty sure they all had remain for the win. Didn't the bookies have it at something like 3/1 for leave and 1/2 for remain?

What happened - I thought everyone would be 'gobbling' this deal up, gobble, gobble, nom, nom....

Do you think the thick f_u_ck meant 'aggravate' rather than 'aggregate'? Unless he is trying to suggest the police are going to combine everyone present into a large giant???

And yet your (remainers as a whole rather than you personablly) argument for a second referendum is predominantly because the population was lied to (by the politicians) during the run up to the first referendum so they were misinformed. You simply can't argue that in one breath and then state that we shouldn't listen to them in the next! Cake and eat it springs to mind!

Surely another referendum would involve believing what politicians will say a second time round?

So that's 1 million, 200 people who have wasted an entire Saturday to march for / against something that has already been rejected in the HoC.

With any luck he'll be in a room next to Jeff shortly!

No way it was 'Arry, 'Arry doesn't even know how to sign! Sandra does all the signing for him, Sand! Sand! where are you Sand I've got another paper to sign! Rosie? Rosie?

Whichever way you look at it, this lady is not for turning!

The legal, default position, is that the UK will leave the EU on the 29th March whether there is a deal or not. The only way this can possibly not happen is if the EU grant an extension to Article 50, which 1. We haven't even asked for yet and 2. The EU have said will not be granted unless there is a realistic chance of the deadlock being broken at the end of the extension. So far as I can tell, May's only bargaining chip to ask for an extension was to get her deal voted for in a third vote - which Bercow has now said cannot happen - and use the extension time to make arrangements for the UK to leave under that deal. Frankly, it looks more and more likely that March 29th will result in the default position of leaving without a deal - unless May and the EU can come up with a deal that satisfies both sides in the next nine days and get it passed through a vote in the Commons - something which they have been unable to achieve in the last two years!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-47612616

Not possible as she cannot arbitrarily make new laws! A new law would have to be passed in order to revoke Article 50. I can see any further GE having the lowest turnout in history!

Can anyone - including Jeff, the certified loony - argue that this is not a sensible plan? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47551266 Surely this is what we should have been focusing on when it became clear that the EU were / are never going to negotiate further and May's deal was dead in the water? Perhaps if this was highlighted earlier in the process it could have saved a lot of businesses a lot of unnecessary costs?

So it's a 'crime' for one party to spend more than the £7m cap (I agree, they broke the electoral law in place), however, the other party can spend £9m+ (of public money) on leaflets in addition to the £7m cap but that is all well and good. I take it all back, you boycotting all websites to do with advocating leaving the EU is completely sane and rational!

Wow! You really are a certified loony! I'm assuming that you have evidence that 'crimes' and 'fraud' have been committed and that the perpetrators of said crimes have undergone due legal process!

Why not? Do you think it will make you a less loyal remainer if you dare to look at the arguments presented by the opposition? Who do you think is looking at your web history - apart from you - that you don't want to find out you've looked at a Brexit website? Do you think you can adequately contribute to the debate if you steadfastly refuse to read anything but the position you've chosen? Seems a little blinkered to be fair....

Ah, that's a shame as that's the night I'm getting my hair done.

Must be part of the recession for daring to vote to leave the EU. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47290331

Why indeed! Also, is there any evidence whatsoever that the EU would NOT have struck this trade agreement with Japan - negotiations started in 2013 didn't they, long before Brexit was even dreamt of? Perhaps 'Brexit' is a convenient scapegoat?

And I thought you were in favour of immigration from Europe and beyond

Terry Christian has always been an idiot. How ironic that the European Court of Human Rights has judged that discrimination on the basis of political views is, in fact, not fair at all. https://www.pureemploymentlaw.co.uk/protection-from-discrimination-on-the-grounds-of-political-views/ Let's hope that Terry the idiot will be be naming the 'at least three' companies that he knows that have decided to break the law

Maybe I missed something but I didn't think we were allowed to sign independent trade deals whilst still an EU member? Negotiate, yes, but not sign until we leave?