I concur. Not for our benefit but for that of the players. If they believe the manager is about to go how will they be able to give him their best?
Hopefully an internal club statement of confidence has already been provided.
You've contradicted yourself.
How is it b*llocks when you've confirmed that he has a direct advisor? He has clearly taken measures to remedy the situation, yet as with all business, he will take time to get things right.
And to suggest Fulham are a bigger club. Before Al Fayeds money they were floating between the bottom two leagues. Some interesting signings in the 70's not withstanding they are at most a club on the scale of Notts County. Their trump card is simply their location.
The only thing this argument shows is that we have players playing out of their depth. Sod the stupid arguments.
After two consecutive promotions that surely cannot be a surprise.
I'm in no way saying that relegation would be conclusive to financial progress, but through buying young talents they have a far better resale value. It's astonishing to think that Steven Fletcher cost Sunderland 14 million pounds.
Following on from relegation we were only in the 'deep sh*t' when Michael Wilde sanctioned Burley's multi-million pounds worth of player purchases. Rupert Lowe's prudence would have stiffled us on the pitch, but the club wouldn't have been put into anything like the risk it was.