Pancake

Anyone else shudder at this weird usage of the word?

I took out your quote that showed by error.

Yeah, a C&P error, corrected now.

Right, Ive seen a few complaints about this thread and some of the view expressed here. As it stands Im not going to censor or delete anything but I do feel a simple reminder of the forum rules is needed: Off-Topic The Lounge - this forum is for general discussion of "off-topic" matters, but generally on a serious note. The Muppet Show - this forum is for light-hearted chat and banter, and most of the usual forum rules don't apply here (within reason). Racist, homophobic and/or pornographic content is still strictly forbidden. Some other content may not be safe for work... such content should clearly be marked in the topic title as "NSFW" or "NWS". DO NOT post racist and/or sexist messages. Infractions: Implied racist remark - 4 points, expires after 6 months With that in mind, can I request that whatever your views are on what certain people are going, there is no need to imply that cross sections of society are "scum" based on religious views, ethnicity or place of birth. Play nice kids please.

So we can assume this didnt originate from a red top then...

3 weeks ago? i was sure he left office in December 2007... http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/australia.asp Oh yeah, more BS...

Load of old ball sacks as usual: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/proudwhite.asp

Neil Young - After the Gold Rush Blind Faith - Blind Faith

Where did it say that the protesters were Iraqi refugees? For all you know, they might have been of P@kistani, Indian, Afghan or Saudi descent. Or maybe even 3rd generation British. The only thing that is mentioned is that they were all Muslim.

Oops, seems this Pancake has batter on the mind.

So why be so upset about it now?

Would the majority of posters on this thread even have battered and eyelid if these anti-war protesters had been white?

Seeing as you have now managed to confuse even yourself on two levels, I'll leave it with you to work out what will happen if the 3 bottom teams end up on 48 points.

Cheers Ponts

Post of the day IMHO.

If only you like pool parties in Essex eh?

So if Norwich, Charlton and Barnsley all fail to pick up more than another 9 points, that means the bottom three would look like this: Barnsley 48pts Norwich 45pts Charlton 36pts Meaning that a team COULD stay up on 49 points, which is NOT "over 50" as you have stated as "FACT" Day following night is a fact, not an opinion or even a "fact waiting to happen". Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

Indeed. Short term form put US top of teh CCC: http://www.fansfocus.com/football/championship/-formguide.php?comp=2&count=4

Done.

Hamster, do you mean matched betting? Using your "free" money to cover what you are trading on a site like Betfair? http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=6068 Have a read on here and follow the links.

Corrupt file

Nope, Im a lazy sod Nice one, thanks P-iN

Anyone seen this anywhere? I know some clever soul did it for the Saints fixtures this year...

Sadly if you speak up an honest and reflective thought like that Bungle you will be labeled a "luvvie". No wonder the main board is slowly dying.

I did think if you as I posted that.