Jump to content

Saint Garrett

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    17,399
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Saint Garrett

  1. coys !!! we are more than capable to get a result tonight. Tomkins in midfield for WHU, hope they're shaky at the back
  2. To be fair, I think the majority of Saints fans would take a point, and some are hopeful that we will win. I don't think 1 Saints fan will be going to Upton Park expecting a win. Though if we do score early then I can see us going on to win by a couple, it's a big game regardless and should be a cracker under the lights.
  3. Says on the BBC we havent beat any of the top 14 away from home....we've only played 7 of them.
  4. No, he's banned.
  5. Noble not playing ? Are you sure ?
  6. Chaplow will not play in the middle, he hasn't done so all season. Especially when he is just coming back from injury. Has to be an unchanged side for me tonight, time for Guly to show his worth, and if it's not working, bring on Puncheon.
  7. Surprised he's dropped down to L2, bit of a coup for them IMO.
  8. Bale is not world class, Walcott I doubt will ever be, Chambo has the potential, but still a long way to go IMO
  9. Is the champions league game not on there ?
  10. http://www.wiziwig.tv/competition.php?discipline=football&part=sports Not listed on here so I very much doubt it.
  11. I would take a guess that we normally take about 20 players with us ? And then the squad is picked from this ? I cant imagine we go to games with only 16.
  12. To be fair, they are a big club, and they are well supported, but are slowly losing their reputation due to their arrogant fans and tosser as a manager.
  13. And people wonder why people think WHU fans are arrogant.... "Vexed 8:14 Mon Feb 13 Your mate sounds like an over excited small time club supporting bellend. Very reminiscent of Blackpool fans last season when they were doing well. Getting a bit above themselves and should pipe the **** down. We have a right to think we should beat everyone in this division, we're ****ing West Ham United for ****s sake. The likes of Southampton should quietly enjoy their 'success' but shouldn't expect to beat anyone, because they're a small time muppet club."
  14. http://www.westhamonline.net/article.php?5970036||mc=w|| My mate wanted me to do a Q+A for him, so that's on there.
  15. Surely they'll start with either Maynard or Baldock? Don't think we'll change from the weekend, I much prefer Guly when he plays at RM, and it also seems to bring out the best in Frazor. Chappers on the bench? 1-2 or 1-1 COYS!
  16. Was this even definitely Millwall fans ? How do you know ?
  17. I don't see why people think Fish is so awful. I always thought he did a decent job at LB under portvliet in this division and wouldn't have looked out of place in L1 last year. About 5 years ago he got promoted from L1 with S****horpe under Adkins. Got a good delivery and clearly other people rate him as he's played for both Donny + Reading consistently at this level.
  18. Would be odd if we signed him...don't we have enough LB's ?
  19. Yes but the power of this forum...
  20. http://www.lfe.org.uk/news/goal-of-the-month-december-january-2012 Vote Jake Sinclair!
  21. Not the best survey I've ever done, but happy to help a fellow Saint (if that is the case). Done.
  22. In my close group of mates (about 10 of us) 8 are West Ham, 1 Moan Utd, and then there is me. (Unfortunately.)
  23. Back to the topic...thought Juke was poor last night, gave the ball away a lot and looked incredibly slow, also seemed a few seconds behind the play, I'm not unhappy we didn't sign him. Was a good finish though to be fair to him.
  24. He might have been handy in the 'reserve teams' but surely he's not going to be too close to the first 11 and not going to be better than Lallana/Puncheon/Chaplow/SDR/Guly/Falque?
  25. Cannot see Holmes getting near the first XI now. Wouldn't be surprised to see Reeves/Holmes/Barnard to go out on loan. Also makes the signing of Falque a bit surplus as well.
×
×
  • Create New...