Gingeletiss

So tell us!

Without a crystall ball last summer why would Antonov do that? He had plenty enough cash back then to buy the players we did AND service the CVA. Pompey fans were way ahead of you in giving the details from Rumafia.com (and other backgroun info) to both the FL and various journalists because of concerns about Antonov's past. They were assured there was nothing to worry about. David Conn acknowledged he'd go his information for his recent article from Pompey fans, did he not? Both replies from Corp ho ho ho in the above post 45454. Ho Ho, Do you think that Antonov realised the money he was throwing at Poopey, was ripped of from Snoras bank customers, as for servicing the CVA, when's that happening, he, according to you at the time, is filthy rich, so why didn't he pay off all the debts at once, like the honourable Herr Liebherr. As for the second comment re the Rumafia articles, I for one have been following your slimy forums for 18 months now, and the first mention of this was after it appeared on here. Not cross your scaly mind, that perhaps Mr Conn got his wires crossed here?

Come on, you taxmen! December 3, 2011 // 0 There is much about modern football to make decent citizens nauseous, but high on the list must be the football creditor rule. This is only marginally more comprehensible than the offside rule, but it says, in essence, that if a club goes bust, everyone on the inside gets paid in full before anyone on the outside gets a penny. You might think that such a rule would be well offside, but it has survived for decades, resisting all attempts to challenge it – partly because the outside creditors include small local suppliers and the St John Ambulance brigade, which lack either the resources or the determination to crack it. Now, finally, the taxman is trying to dribble his way through the Premier League’s defences. The rule has always been unfair, but the awesome sums paid to the few at the top, and the fortunes so casually spent on trophy asset clubs by owners of doubtful pedigree make it grotesque. Today there is serious money at stake – especially PAYE and National Insurance - and the lost tax effectively amounts to a subsidy from the poor to the rich. As HMRC argues, this should be “unlawful and against public policy.” However obvious this may seem, the League’s defence may prove hard to break down. When what is delicately described as an “insolvency event” occurs, the money hose from media rights and sponsorship is immediately diverted away from the club to the football creditors. This underwrites the unedifying spectacle of the hugely-rewarded players and managers getting paid in full while small suppliers may get a few pennies in the pound. The League argues that without the rule, its fixture list could be disrupted by a bankruptcy. The answer to that, surely, is insurance. The owners of the clubs would have to pay the premiums, at levels reflecting the financial discipline of each. Those which do not currently understand the meaning of that phrase would get an expensive education. The case kicked off in the High Court this week and is expected to run for a fortnight. Come on, you taxmen! Ummm! who could he be referring to

beaten, but not disgraced.

Indeed it has, take out those three quick goals, and it has been a very even game imo.

Skates at home, then hammer them.

But still your boss huh!

Make that 3 quality goals

Mods can close this straight away if they wish....just to say that AFC Totton v Bristol Rovers live on ITV now.

May I suggest not winning every game!

Well....that's my 3-0 out the window

Burnley equaliser

Storrie...

This.

But he's not the administrator, only of CSI

The Football League need not bother even thinking of deducting us points, unless they want to open their doors and find a couple of thousand people waving Fit and Proper banners next time we play in London. And they might want to consider giving us an interest free loan or two if we need a bit of working capital. In fact, given the disaster they have just helped walk us into, they should give us ten points and a couple of million quid Is that a threat I'm seeing?

Like I said, the ones I've seen, then you quote the left wing dog, that is the BBC...lol

Plus...all the polls I've seen, show that the public support is against the strike.

Wrong again! Spoke to a young female teacher mid thirties last night, she said that life would be hell at school, if she didn't strike, this was made clear to her. Unions are bully boys, pure and simple.

Get over yourself.. no pay rise in three years, a loss two years ago of £50 a week and holiday, and no pay rise next year, to be sure. Your 'pay cap' is at 1%, at least it's something ffs. This hundreds of thousands, they wouldn't be the ones the Labour government invented by chance?

We know that won't be proven!

About 20 times!

HO HO HO, your take on this please, are you on gardening leave or something?

oldnick, can I put the bread back in my toaster yet?

I voted for the NSPCC............ :lol: