trousers

Sssshhhhhh

Rupert's white tie catches the light from his face

Wilde: "You see those internet geeks sitting there? Make sure you keep your ears covered so they can't work out which branch of David Dein's family you are from"

Woman back to Wilde: "So when will these kids be old enough to understand that concept?" (sorry...cheap shot)

Wilde: Look, these shares are worth next to nothing. Can you Help me Rhonda?

Reading the above rams it home that Lowe has control over a football club with such a paultry sum of bottom-line cash. Just over £300k? How can a single man have so much power and grip on a club with such a small stake?

Is it me or are 80% of Echo articles a direct cut-and-paste of what's posted on here the day before?!

Wilde: You see this letter I'm holding? Hand it to Rupert and he'll read it out at the AGM. Don't worry, it'll be anonymous

Do what I did and take up masturbation instead. That's not illegal as long as you confine yourself to one of the traps in the toilet and it has the added bonus of being quicker than a fag (so to speak)

Interesting that the article isn't attributed to a specific reporter as is usually the case.

Saga to play against Man Utd? Hmmm....Here's hoping Saga isn't on the Nathan Dyer "3 days off" training plan then....

Does anyone know if Mr Lowe has ever put a timescale on his 'recovery plan' achieving its aim (the 'aim' being, one assumes, to get us back into the Premiership ultimately...) ? If it's, say, a 5 year plan then "where we are now" is a recoverable position in a 5 year timeframe....you could even cover relegation and two promotions in that timescale. However, if Lowe's "project" was based on a 3 year (or less) plan then our current position is indeed a risk to the project succeeding...

No need to have a pop at our entire remaining strike force in a thread about Stern John

Here's hoping them there eggs don't break...

Depends what one compares the 100,000 against. 100,000 Vs total issued shares = peanuts 100,000 Vs the last time a round 6 figure trade went through = potentially significant. A six figure single trade of SLH shares is a pretty rare occurrence....that's all.

It would appear not....

Fyddan nhw ddim ond yn cysgu pan fydd angen.

I pondered the question on a matter of principle...rather than how good or desirable the player is.... I simply don't understand why a player wouldn't go straight back into training from day-1. People ask: "Why? What difference does it make?" I ask: "Why not? What difference does it make?" Perhaps I should give NASA a bell....

What's the study of lactuca sativa got to do with it?

Yes Yes All in my humble opinion of course. (yes, I know, I know....this is not the place for different opinions but he who dares....)

Yes, I am. Happy to clarify. Thanks also for clearing up when New Year is. Is it 1st Jan every year? You learn something new every day on here. Ok, so Dyer is only on a 3 day break between games. So that's OK then....

+1 (sorry, just raised as a separate thread to avoid hijacking a thread about a sad incident)

Nathan Dyer Nathan is expected to report back for training in the New Year and has made seven appearances for Sheffield United, including three starts. He scored in the Blades recent 2-2 home draw against Crystal Palace, and was joined on the score-sheet by ex-Saints striker James Beattie, but the Eagles earned a point with a last minute equaliser. http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=11153 Any idea why Dyer's effectively taking a week off at such a crucial stage of the season? His loan deal ended at the weekend....

Yet more economies of truth on the OS? Either his contract ended on 13th or it didn't....and thus he was either available for selection or back at Sheff Utd. What's wrong with telling us the truth once in a while? (p.s. the Daily Mail article also suggests that Dyer is back when it says that Robertson is back at Sheff Utd and that the 'player swap deal' with Saints terminated)

A 100,000 share trade at 18.5p this morning.... Oo-er missus.... Fulthorpe starting to make a move....?