Jump to content

Matthew Le God

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    31491
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matthew Le God

  1. Why do you have a problem if they used the 1885 style kit? After all, it is to celebrate 125 years.
  2. Umbro made the kit from 1974 to 1976
  3. If you are celebrating 125 years then c) is the only option! Wear a shirt in the style of that 125 years ago.
  4. Most appropriate shirt sponsor... If Carlsberg did football club owners
  5. Most appropriate shirt sponsor... If Carlsberg did football club owners
  6. All sponsorship deals would have clauses in them. If the team goes up then the company would have to pay accordingly.
  7. Until Dell computers are are emblazoned across Saints shirts I won't be happy.
  8. What about 18 players, as you have 7 subs in League One not 6?
  9. Why do you keep calling it "Warsaw"?
  10. I'd jump in front of and take a bullet for Markus at the moment!
  11. That is still just an unsubstantiated rumour at the moment. Would be great if true though!
  12. I did just say that.
  13. Any Saints XI without Morgan Schneiderlin is null and void.
  14. Another key point is the size of the debt and the likelihood that in 40 days it could be paid. If there is seen to be no hope then there is no point delaying the inevitable.
  15. Either £22(behind goal or wings) or £25(centre) for an adult and they really want you to go to the Walsall game but it is at the discretion of the ticket office staff.
  16. In Scotland it is. 5pm in England.
  17. 10.3 is going to be alot of fun!
  18. It isn't over yet. Yes, 5pm has gone but deals can still be announced after 5pm if completed before 5pm.
  19. Where have you seen Wolves were interested in Danns? It is other Palace players they have been linked with.
  20. Because Wikipedia can be edited by ANYONE in the world. ffs
  21. Saints related?
  22. Well as Thomson and Jaidi are at the club still like you said, Saints do currently have internationals.
  23. Yes, I would think so. Notts County faced a HMRC winding up order and that was delayed for 28 days because the bill was relatively small at £300k and they proved they had new investment coming. Pompey don't have a small debt nor proof of investment coming in so giving 28 days would be pointless and delaying the inevitable.
  24. Source? Because they have no "point of law" on the HMRC, others on the petition are straight forward which Pompey can't appeal against and is a frivolous waste of the courts time.
×
×
  • Create New...