Matthew Le God

Private sector vs Public sector This thread is supposed to be about ducks and toasters!

There were no reports of Southampton interest in signing him. An article about fans shortening betting odds is not the same as a rumour linking him to Saints.

Have you considered that the rumour of him signing could be bullshit?

Because he made some good ones, so there is no need for me to also use them. Give it a try and actually answer his points, as he completely unpicked your nonsense.

Please respond to all the excellent points @Sheaf Saint made to counter your nonsense.

Don't confuse @Turkish for someone able to take on board any of of those very good points and form any kind of coherent rebuttal.

There is no fail, apart from your failure with comprehension of your native language. - The character as described in the Bible is a 'he'. - The character of Harry Potter in the Harry Potter book series is a 'he'. Two fictional characters, both are characters in a book described as being a 'he'.

English comprehension is letting you down again. I've made no comment on God's sexuality. Plus, the character of God as described in the Bible is undeniably male as the scripture uses male pronouns, that is completely separate from the issue of God existing or not.

As we know the creator is the fan account on Twitter and not Hummel it can't be. I didn't say the design in general couldn't be like those shirts, just that it is not from Hummel.

I did not say it couldn't be that design, I merely said that it was a fan mock up rather than anything Hummel have made.

I don't even know where to start unpacking the flaws in your current line of nonsense, but I'll give it a go. Until it is shown otherwise, the written description of the character of the Christian God is all we have to go on. The Bible describes God as 'he', so the claim that 'the Christian God as written in scripture is male' is demonstrably true and separate from any God actually being male (because you'd first have to prove existence.

No I'm not. I've already answered your nonsense claim regarding God's gender in my previous post.

I know the Bible says God is a he... because the Bible says God is a he in the opening of the book and throughout the rest of it! Genesis 1 1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. 3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.

Yet again you ignored the question and took it off on a tangent.

The times it occurred in is completely, a complete red herring and utterly irrelevant as they are the rules of God, so if God is treating men and women differently in terms of how you can lie to them then that makes him sexist. He is also instructing death for those who disobey, is that a suitable punishment for the crime?

I don't recall Eddie Howe taking a newly promoted team to 2nd place in their first season after promotion to the top flight.

1) You clearly don't understand irony or cherry picking. If the Bible is the word of God as some claim and God is 100% good, all that is required to disprove this is one bad thing. So even if the Bible says a million good things about God, a single bad thing disproves the claim he is 100% good. 2) Enlighten me, which bits have I not understood? Could it instead be a case that in order to shoehorn the horrendous parts of the Bible into an acceptable form for the 21st Century you've had ignore or twist large parts of it for modern sensibilities rather than the scripture intended for bronze age farmers? 3) Why are so focused on me saying I'm having a pint tomorrow? You can drive on that, so why can't you lesson plan?

Nonsense. He did not do a good job of that. Plus I thought you believed in free will given to us by God? In which case mothers aren't required to give a shit, so this stuff happens... https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-61608888

It was Blackburn triggering a 1 year extension in the deal, rather than him signing a new contract. That doesn't mean he won't be sold this summer, just means Blackburn can get a fee for him nie rather than him leaving on a free. https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/61420909

How is being fast tracked to a celestial North Korea where you are forced to worship a deity who endorses rape, sexism, murder and slavery etc for eternity count as a 'paradise'?

Because it is about a man lying with another man how you would with a woman. How do you lie differently to a woman in terms if it being nit telling the truth? Plus... you ignored my question... yet again!

Regardless of the old law still applying or not (and that website is not convincing at all on that count). The fact the book claims it did apply at some point makes the character of the god who created it horrificly evil even if he later went on to remove it.

That is utter rubbish and makes no sense when used in the context of 'as with a women'. It is clearly about sex, not telling a lie. Even if you were right, do you honestly think the acceptable punishment for a lie should be death? Any god who thinks death should be the punishment for lying is clearly horrificly evil.