Jump to content

Matthew Le God

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    30,601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matthew Le God

  1. Not from an existing contract.
  2. Why would he do that? Would you give up millions of pounds?
  3. Yet again you are making it clear you don't understand statistics. Each chance is given a value from 0 to 1 based on comparing it to similar chances in other games and the liklihood of those being goals. I think the key issue is you misunderstanding the purpose of using xG.
  4. No-one But so what? You completely miss the fundamental point of xG. xG is all about % liklihood of scoring that chance comparing it to similar chances in those conditions and how often it results in a goal. That is why it can be not a whole number.
  5. Your post started with saying "I’ve never quite understood", which is confusion. I've attempted to explain it. Clearly you still don't understand how xG works.
  6. The video explains your confusion as to why it isn't a whole number.
  7. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    Two more dead today and another wounded...
  8. What a bizarre shortlist!
  9. Not really, the majority are guesses. That information is not publicly available.
  10. If it was this, then it is out of date... That is based on the claim Gao Jisheng was worth £3b, not Dragan Solak. Solak's wealth has been reported in some media to be closer to £1b. Plus in any case, what the owner is worth doesn't matter as much as how much they are willing to spend. Solak investing some of a £1b fortune is better than Gao not investing any of the £3b (if he even had that much!).
  11. I was asking for evidence. Your statement is not evidence.
  12. On what is that based?
  13. Calm down. He does not have Facebook, someone was posing as him.
  14. 13th and only 2 points off 9th place not good enough for a team that has had no investment for circa 5+ years? If anything he is over achieving despite how shit it feels after abject performances like tonight.
  15. Nope, Livramento also played in midfield like Walker-Peters was doing when he came off. It was a 4222/442 fir the entire time after the subs were made.
  16. It was not a back five for the whole game. When Elyounoussi and Armstrong went off, it was a back four and Walker-Peters went into midfield and it became a 4222/442.
  17. It was not a back five for the whole game. When Elyounoussi and Armstrong went off, it was a back four and Walker-Peters went into midfield.
  18. I'm puzzled what you think he is doing wrong. It would be more than 2-0 if it wasn't for him.
  19. https://amp.theguardian.com/football/2018/oct/26/mohamed-elyounoussi-southampton-interview There was even a pizza named after Elyounoussi on the menu, although his Muslim faith means he has never tasted the Moi Special. “The toppings were actually things I can’t eat,” he says. “Ham, pepperoni, stuff like that. My father had 23 pizzas on the menu. He added No 24 and at the time that was the number on my shirt.”
  20. Matthew Le God

    Russia

    So you failed to link to a post 🙄
  21. Bored of facts? 😉😇
  22. Against Arsenal it was more of a 541 formation. Tonight is more likely to look like 343, so very different. Perraud, Walker-Peters, Armstrong and Elyounoussi will likely be a lot further forward than the weekend.
×
×
  • Create New...