Matthew Le God

Liebherr did give Saints £20.4m and is listed in the 2009/10 accounts. Makes no mention of when or even if it has to be paid back. Cortese says there is no debt, so possibly the money just added to the value of the club when it is sold at some point in the future. No problem for Saints.

Portpin have £500k to give to Pompey but only if UHY is admin, not Trevor Birch.

Gas and electric now cut off according to SSN. EDIT: They worded it poorly in the headlines.

How can they have "agreed to it" when HMRC were a creditor for the CVA and this is the first they've heard of it?

Surely that means a huge points deduction?

How do HMRC know what the Football League would do?

Doesn't sound good for them... Judge comments that Mr Andronikou's claim that the club could break even in administration was 'patently optimistic'. He adds: 'it seems the club will trade at a loss'.

How on earth could a supporters trust buy the club given the huge amount of money it would require? Penny really hasn't a clue.

It is in the game already really. The values reflect how it will be when it is finished in June 2013.

Not been announced, was in March last year for FM11.

Luckily she looks like she has a mean streak when she puts a wig on...

This is what the new application is for.... http://web3.newforest.gov.uk/images/planningimages/201135_10.pdf Was submitted 10 days ago on the New Forest planning website and is awaiting planning permission.

That isn't the only gym, there is also a rehabilitation gym plus the academy gym in the training dome.

Looks extremely impressive... http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10280~2613018,00.html

He means Jack Stephens. Jack Stephens isn't injured, he played for 90 minutes in the development team game against Brighton today. Back to the original question, it would be a big risk to give a full league debut to a teenager in the run in of a promotion campaign when there are senior players able to cover in that position.

Don't worry, it is easily done.

Read the article, the headline is misleading... Football finance expert Dr Chris Brady said: "Rangers may be the tip of the iceberg. EBTs became popular with clubs as a means of reducing crippling wage bills. We believe at least eight current or former Premier League clubs are being investigated."

Pompey one of the eight clubs being investigated for using Employment Benefit Trusts perhaps (wouldn't put it past them) and their debt to taxman to grow even further? http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4130498/8-Premier-League-clubs-to-go-bust-like-Rangers.html

I doubt you'll reply to this, but here goes... - Southampton went into Admin in April 2009. They didn't sign any players between going into admin and the takeover. Before that they used 18 -21 year olds when needed. - Pompey are going into admin in February 2012 whilst the loan window is still open. They have under 18 players that can be used and should be used. Southampton had more players than Pompey do, but they did use the younger members of the squad and didn't need to get to the under 18's. Pompey on the other hand have a small squad and refuse to use the players in the under 18's already at the club and instead want to add new senior players.

They should be forced to use their under 18's to plug the gaps.

That would resort in a bigger points penalty.

Lampitt just confirmed UHY will be administrators!