The Kraken

That's irrelevant, form means nothing. I mean, it meant something when we were top of the pops after the first few games, but now? Nah, it means nothing. Numbers look bad. It's all a conspiracy. Lawro did it, probably.

Agreed. It is a great book and I'd encourage every Saints fan to buy it.

I already did it Wow. A poor act just got worse.

:lol: You crack me up every time you supreme japester you :lol:

Yep. 2 points from 5 is definitely better than I thought we could have. Hang on. No. It isn't.

Do the Groundhog pic!

zzzzzzzzzzzzz

Keep your chin up, Glesgie. Its sad when morons like Window Cleaner accuse you of trolling just for posting a form table.

Yeah, cheers for that. I've got cellone on ignore and you go and quote him. You've ruined my weekend.

I've got you on ignore too.

He's got you on ignore. Just like suewhistle, I don't think he's ever mentioned it before.

I'm only joshing MLG, I enjoy your wholly unnecessary pedantry really. Not as much as I enjoy it when you're wrong, though. But enjoyable nonetheless.

Quite common, but quite commonly wrong. Rather like your good self

And thirdly?

Firstly, the Irish have a Taoiseach as opposed to a PM. Secondly, Lawrenson was born in Lancashire and is therefore eligible to be the PM. Thirdly, the Prime Minister is the PM of the UK (Great Britain and NI), not just Great Britain. Pedantry. Any idiot can do it.

You can't have two PMs at the same time.

If we'd have won all of our games we would be top.

He wasn't a disaster; his points per game record was ok. But he was an accident waiting to happen. It was just a shame that, after we binned him off, we went and brought in an even more obvious accident waiting to happen. Steve Wigley; now there was a disaster.

I genuinely can't see how technology could work for offsides, other than going down the video replay route which I'm very much not in favour of. In terms if GLT it's a very minor thing but it's clearly good that it's been introduced and gives the officials one less thing to worry about.

That is genuinely ridiculous.

http://metro.co.uk/2013/04/10/arsenal-quoted-15m-for-stoke-goalkeeper-asmir-begovic-3590447/

The backbone of the success of the Premier League was built upon these lads and other luminaries such as Gerry Francis, Peter Shreeves, David Pleat and Howard Wilkinson. That was when football was football.

Yes, you also have the other end of the scale with BFS, Tony Pulis and Martin O'Neill.

And you'd have to say that none of them have gone in there and shaped a side in their mould. There's something not quite working. We're very much in MP's mould, but you look at sides like Arsenal under Wenger, Liverpool under Rodgers, Chelsea under Mourinho first time round, Swansea under Laudrup, even Everton under Martinez. Those teams play in the certain style of their manager and look to do things in their own way. Never had that feeling with Spurs, and I don't think they've ever made the most of their sizeable spending.

In the summer there were figures of £15M+ being bandied around for him. Would we shell that out? He's "only" 26 which isn't much in keeper's terms. Very good keeper; not sure I see it though.