Dibden Purlieu Saint

50k. Bargain. Good signing.

I don't think people are getting my point. Never mind.

Potentially it is all a coincidence, I just feel that it tends to happen more with black players than any others. But it could be that they are stupid, and not racist.

I did say unintentional or subliminal...

Look, it's just my opinion on the matter, but it seems that some fans jump on black players backs quicker than they do others. Either they are racist, whether intentional or subliminally, or ****ing pig **** thick. Either way, they usually tend to be wrong.

Nope, because they are genuinely bad players. That's the point. The others aren't, but are still scapegoated. I remember it used to happen with Kenwyne too.

Well, you 'think' wrong. All transfers are undisclosed nowadays by the way, but the press are always given the ball park figure by the club. Let's them report it properly, and allows the clubs to maintain a little bit of secrecy.

No. I genuinely believe that some of the people on this site are being racist. There is no other reason why players like Fuller (playing for Stoke and playing well in the Prem), Puncheon (was not given even time before the boos and groans started and is now ripping apart the Championship) and Guly (2 assists yesterday, great link up play, yet is still ****) are not given a chance here.

Very happy. Onwards and Upwards.

Yep, that's right. Apart from Delph, who went for £8m.

Quick quiz... What links the following 4 players? Guly, Jason Puncheon, BWP, Jermaine Wright, Ricardo Fuller. They have all been used as a scapegoat when we aren't playing well by certain sections of the crowd, yet have all shown themselves to play well at a higher level than at Saints (perhaps not BWP). What else links them? Ah yes, they aren't white. Come on guys, racism just aint Saintly.

Yeah, but Les Reed is a ****.

FYI, Trader Media is doing very well at the moment, not sure where you heard that all from??

Working Class.

Ok, Thatcher was a great economist, and a good leader, but Dune, you are starting to grate on even me. Thatcher had to make difficult decisions that no other leader since has had to make, so she really splits opinions.

I think we can all agree that there is a lot is waste.in the public sector. This has been proved year after year by independent bodies. To me, until all efficiencies have been reaped, there is no need to raise taxes. Is this a more friendly way of putting it?

But why would he be, I thought the point was he was a nondom? What advantage, if he is a nondom, would it be to have the Arcadia Group listed under his wifes name?

He's in one or two days a week. Ian Grabiner is fully hands on in running the actual company.

But what difference would it make to him? He doesn't pay tax anyway you're all saying, so it wouldn't matter if it was in his name or not, being a nondom and all...

Oh yeah, I get that. The reason I am saying this is that I think the Arcadia Group is owned by his wife...

If you want to know what Verbal looks like:

Exactly the same with me.

Surely it's down to the make up of his companies though??

Anyone going to answer this, or is the answer to the original question 'unrealistic'? I'm thinking that is the conclusion for this thread.

Surely then people who support the idea and implementation of socialism are therefore unrealistic as they know that it needs the full planet to participate, and that will not happen.