Jump to content

Turkish

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    53,496
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Turkish

  1. Even funnier than putting someone on ignore then talking about it every time they post are the people who put someone on ignore, then when they have been quoted by someone else join in the conversation by replying to both posts usually started with the sentance "you can see why i've got him on ignore cant you, but to answer the troll......"
  2. Turkish

    Van hire

    You never get it right do you. It's ink and paper. How come you're on the computer at this time, Jamie Doesn't the captain want his lunch?
  3. Turkish

    Van hire

    Wont be moving any white goods, the biggest item will the sofas and a side board, all our tables, wardrobes, beds, chest of draws etc we can take apart. Although it will be pretty everything else you can think of that a normal house would have. I'm thinking two Luton vans now. I dont really want to be driving up and down the motorway all weekend or only hire one and then not fit it all in.
  4. Turkish

    Van hire

    Cheers guys, could be in trouble here then, am moving up that way in a month. Maybe two Luton vans is the answer?
  5. More evidence as to why women should be banned from football.
  6. Turkish

    Van hire

    I need to hire a 7.5 tonne van for a weekend, ideally want to pick it up in Southampton and return it in the Leeds area. Can anyone recommend a company that will do this?
  7. I didnt realise i did. The reality is that the vast majority arent going to spend the whole game necking pints, you'll probably get what you get at the cricket where people probably take one or two up to the seats then refill them at half time. The main problem is going to be beer flying everywhere when a goal is scored, which it will do. Bottles would elminate this, but then a full bottle of beer can make a dangerous weapon if thrown. So i'm going to change my view from my other post and say that on reflection only bottles are allowed, as coke bottles are currently allowed without any problems. Blocks 1-3 and the Northam are dry zones. and i dont see the risks, if the lads in the itchen north and northam want a beer they are going to have to move, this would move them further awy from the away fans. if they dont then nothing changes. It could in fact help the atmosphere and reduce the risk of trouble with less potential for fans to give each other verbals during the game and clash outside after.
  8. so do you agree that if the areas around the away fans and high risk games were "dry" it would eliminate the risk of problems?
  9. true though isn't it. No booze near the away fans, no problems.
  10. I dont see why some people are making it so complicated and certain it would cause trouble. It's quite simple to enforce. No booze for the areas near the away fans, no booze for high risk games where clubs with a bit of a rep for trouble. You basically make blocks 1-3 and some of the northam no booze zones, Everywhere else can drink without the risk of being caught in the cross fire of Colinjb's drunken thugs spending the whole match launching pints at each other, no bottles allowed, just pint or half pint plastic glasses. Job done.
  11. i heard a similar verison except the punchline was They haven't done it yet, but it's definitely going to be their year to do it.
  12. Thanks, i'm glad i have like minded people around like yourself, who know how difficult it can be to support me. Sorry to see you've given up ever wishing to be more than you are.
  13. I prefer saintsboyinleeds.
  14. But we have so much in common. It's arguable that we have a similar worth to the forum, neither of us are funny or knowledgable, I think disasters of human beings like us need to stick together, a kind of REM group for mongboards if you like.
  15. In that case we have plenty in common, you and I. Maybe we can become forum friends?
  16. Indeed it has, I don't know if I'll ever recover from such a shock.
  17. Why the abuse? I'm simply pointing out that the ideology that we would never, ever, couldn't possibly sign a player who was a bit of a trouble maker at his current club is in fact totally incorrect.
  18. Yeah you're right. We'd never sign anyone who would kick up a fuss with their current clubs, especially to get a move away. http://www.crunchsports.com/category/Soccer/Liverpool-FC-target-Gaston-Ramirez-threatens-to-go-on-strike-201208240017/
  19. I know, it's embarassing isn't it. Liverpool, that team in decline, destined for a future of mid table nonentities. a club that only sign cart horses and with the most deluded and arrogant fans in the country. If we can only target players of their level we are never going to fullfil our champions league ambitions as we'll be stuck with a team full of Stuart Downings and Jordan Hendersons. Come of Cortese, a bit more walking the walk and a bit less talking the talk please. We need to aim higher.
  20. Walcott is just a sprinter with no football brain FFS
  21. Well if you hadn't lied about why you gave up your season ticket then you wouldn't get abuse. Look in the mirror les bender, you big,fat, gay, porky pie teller.
  22. If you have someone on ignore its vitally important that you announce it regularly, it gives a tremendous feeling of smug self importance as well as another dagger into the midriff of victim of the ignore feature.
  23. He reminded the commentator of him.
  24. Was compared to Craig Bellamy on radio 5.
  25. What a team that was. Loads of goals, fantastic football. We would have finished 3rd if we'd won our last two games IIRC.
×
×
  • Create New...