Oh dear Francis cousin, you're a little aggressive today arent you? Maybe i'm confused but isn't it standard practice on here to DEMAND names and souces for rumours. Yes, in fact only the other day when there was talk of club employees not being happy we were told in no uncertain terms to name them and what their grivencances were. In fact, in virtually every rumour or story people dont want to believe this is always the case. However, when it's a rumour people want to believe, generally the poster is thanked for th informaiton with a round of applause and back slapping as to how this is much more believable that all that other horse sh*t that was made up. The same seems to apply to media articles doesn't it? Positive stories are lauded as brilliant pieces of journalism and great news, anything other than that, well, not so much. Maybe i'm being thick, but i'm wondering why there is a difference. Perhaps you could explain?