Turkish

Reference to gammon ✔️ Laughing Emoji ✔️ only two more posts for the full set where you start calling people cunts, thick and saying "its not rocket science"

Yeah maybe! What a brilliant point mate, i cant think why they call you aintclever

Wife has just tested positive on a lateral flow and cannot book a PCR test anywhere in the county

Interesting that those arguing it was definitely a foul, Doherty made no attempt to play the ball, using his back being to Forster as their "proof" are the stattos and aintclever, who when it comes to any subject on here just backs whatever decision has been made, he is the Peter Walton of this forum.

I see Sky are being dramatic as every with break news alerts everytime someone gets covid, already had one today about Arteta and now some darts players who has pulled out of the PDC after testing positive.

Yep that's how i saw it, why a keeper of Forsters size isn't claiming of clearing that above his head is bizarre, there is contact but it's minimal, we'd be fuming if the goal had been disallowed up the other end. It's laughable people trying to make out he deliberately fouled Forster and only looked at him, he attacked a ball coming in from the Spurs right whilst running in from the left, follows the flight of the ball all the way and anyone who has ever headed a ball in their life knows you cant just jump up like a Jack in the Box to get leverage and power, there will be a motion in your body to get the height and connection needed. Very lucky to get away with that. As for the offside under the rules and given we had at least one disallowed by a sleeve last season then it's the correct and consistent decision, would have been annoyed if the goal had stood.

Why does it matter if he had his back to Forster or not? Like i said, i doubt you've ever tried to win a header in match in your life. He was clearly jumping, eyes on the ball, using arms to leverage to get to head the ball. laughable people saying he was not trying to get the ball and deliberately fouled Forster.

No it doesn't. You're talking Utter nonsense as usual. You stattos have probably never jumped to head a ball in your life so i wouldn't expect you to get it.

Under the rules he was offside and given that we had one disallowed for Ings sleeve being offside last season it was the right call, although the argument still stands about which part of the body should the decision be made on.

Here is is my freeze frame evidence he was looking at the ball and not only jumping into Forster whilst backing into him to stop him catching it.

Your freeze frame photos prove nothing. Trying to say he wasn't looking at the ball only jumping backing into Forster is laughable and embarassing.

That isn't what happened at all.

We could rely on you to get it wrong as well.

There aren’t many neutrals when it comes to spurs though. Either you’re a spurs fans or you hate them

Agreed. Well done on using glovesman too 👏👏👍

I’m struggling to see how anyone can think it was a foul. If that has been us having a goal disallowed there would be uproar about biased refs favouring the big clubs. It was poor goalkeeping and we got lucky simple as

We had 3 the last two games

We had 3 the last two games so why weren’t we demanding the game called off?

The premier league where the former chairman once said “the poor form for Man United hurts premier league tv figures” tells you all you need to know about the integrity of the league

#resultsdrivenbusiness

I thought he looked alright going forward 11 v 11 but naturally less so when we switched to a back 4 and had Adam Armstrong in front of him. Overall did well, we seem to have gone from being shite in the full back positions to it being arguably our strongest area

And is that 13 of their named 25 or 13 in the whole club? I remember we had to field basically a bench of u23 players last season as we had so many injuries.

It won’t happen. Hayden will be back and they’ll only be one player down from last night even with Wilson and Saint Maximin out. Plus the game is on Sunday so possibly have their covid players back.

Exactly. They are a very poor team without Wilson and saints maximin, you’d fancy us and Everton to beat them without them which would put us 13 points clear of them with 18 matches left, if we didn’t finish above them In those circumstances then we deserve to go down. They’ll want Newcastle in the premier league for the money and TV rights in Arab countries

What are the actual rules for postponement? Didn’t Chelsea ask for their game to be postponed then basically field a full strength team And win away quite comfortably? I’m sure the premier league have a way of validating these claims of covid and injuries so that their system is not open to abuse as we all know it’s an entirely transparent and open league when equality of clubs is paramount importance.