Turkish

Why does it matter if he had his back to Forster or not? Like i said, i doubt you've ever tried to win a header in match in your life. He was clearly jumping, eyes on the ball, using arms to leverage to get to head the ball. laughable people saying he was not trying to get the ball and deliberately fouled Forster.

No it doesn't. You're talking Utter nonsense as usual. You stattos have probably never jumped to head a ball in your life so i wouldn't expect you to get it.

Under the rules he was offside and given that we had one disallowed for Ings sleeve being offside last season it was the right call, although the argument still stands about which part of the body should the decision be made on.

Here is is my freeze frame evidence he was looking at the ball and not only jumping into Forster whilst backing into him to stop him catching it.

Your freeze frame photos prove nothing. Trying to say he wasn't looking at the ball only jumping backing into Forster is laughable and embarassing.

That isn't what happened at all.

We could rely on you to get it wrong as well.

There aren’t many neutrals when it comes to spurs though. Either you’re a spurs fans or you hate them

Agreed. Well done on using glovesman too 👏👏👍

I’m struggling to see how anyone can think it was a foul. If that has been us having a goal disallowed there would be uproar about biased refs favouring the big clubs. It was poor goalkeeping and we got lucky simple as

We had 3 the last two games

We had 3 the last two games so why weren’t we demanding the game called off?

The premier league where the former chairman once said “the poor form for Man United hurts premier league tv figures” tells you all you need to know about the integrity of the league

#resultsdrivenbusiness

I thought he looked alright going forward 11 v 11 but naturally less so when we switched to a back 4 and had Adam Armstrong in front of him. Overall did well, we seem to have gone from being shite in the full back positions to it being arguably our strongest area

And is that 13 of their named 25 or 13 in the whole club? I remember we had to field basically a bench of u23 players last season as we had so many injuries.

It won’t happen. Hayden will be back and they’ll only be one player down from last night even with Wilson and Saint Maximin out. Plus the game is on Sunday so possibly have their covid players back.

Exactly. They are a very poor team without Wilson and saints maximin, you’d fancy us and Everton to beat them without them which would put us 13 points clear of them with 18 matches left, if we didn’t finish above them In those circumstances then we deserve to go down. They’ll want Newcastle in the premier league for the money and TV rights in Arab countries

What are the actual rules for postponement? Didn’t Chelsea ask for their game to be postponed then basically field a full strength team And win away quite comfortably? I’m sure the premier league have a way of validating these claims of covid and injuries so that their system is not open to abuse as we all know it’s an entirely transparent and open league when equality of clubs is paramount importance.

You know it’s coming. Klopp blaming the amount of fixtures his 25 man squad of multi millionaires have to play.

Probably about 3m reasons why.

Next saints manager. You heard it here first

He’s playing two midfielders at centre back ahead of him 🤣🤣🤣

Read post 7 on the thread and note the sarcasm in my post 😉

It wont be, Mullins is back who was suspended last night so they are only one player down from the Man United game, will possibly have some covid players back too