Turkish

Yeah but if you take out the games the 6 Man United conceded against the same Spurs side, the 7 Liverpool conceded against a Villa side who have won every game, the 6 Fulham have conceded also against Villa and an in form Arsenal, The 3 Brighton also conceded against the same chelsea team, the 3 WBA also conceded against Chelsea and the 5 they conceded against top the table Everton, suddenly our defensive record is one of the worst. Anyone can play the what if game.

maybe a full back on loan as cover but that'll be that.

Wow, it's real statement of intent that we have the same sponsor as big 6 clubs! What a job Semmens is doing. Semmens, woooh wooooh He's VP of Strategy He f*cking hates Pompey

There is not a person in the world who should be taken more seriously than a grown adult who spends their life on computer games

Still replying. I must really bore you as 7 of your last 12 posts have been about or in reply to me

and again

Surely all you need is to be half decent at football manager?

Such a yawn yet you continue to reply and post about me. You can’t get enough can you, just admit it, no shame, you’re not the only one.

So when I said a asking a mod would be more of a sensible option than Jesus to sort out a forum posting spat I was right. Thank you for proving me right lighthouse

Sorry mate, i forgot that you're such a hilarious and enlightening poster. Got angry about a typo in the echo again recently?

it's know. Also why are you claiming the son of false deity with no factual evidence of his existence should intervene in a discussion on a football forum. Surely the moderators would be a far more reliable and efficient control mechanism for regulating discussion on here. See without me to control MLG then this is what you'd be subject too.

I didn't say it was a factual claim, i said it was a claim, a claim based on an opinion which is based on inconsistent benchmarking. Therefore an inaccurate and ill informed opinion.

What's your point? They use evidence 30+ years old in court rooms in legal cases. He made the claims not me. He is the one inconsistently measuring the performance of teams early in the season. The burden of proof is on MLG

Incorrect. MLGs raison d'etre on here is to jump onto every single thread correcting people even for the most minor or irrelevant of posts. Part of my role is to police him. For example on this thread his brash claim that 4 clubs look awful after a very short period of time. I'm simply pointing out that in similar circumstances in 2012/13 when we were promoted he dismissed our early poor from as "adapting to the premier league". When this was pointed out he claimed he was basing his opinion on player quality, failing to take into account 2 of our back 4 and our goalkeeper during our "adaption period" were no where near premier league quality. He has not taken into account all the facts, done a like for like comparison on player quality or given either of the newly promoted teams a famous adaption period that he allowed our players to mitigate their early poor form. Surely for someone who prides themselves on pedantry all these factors should be taken into account and a consistent approach applied before any conclusions can be drawn.

Considering you recently claimed to make 3 typos in 7 letters and numbers then a bit rich of you to point out other peoples, or was your typo claim another lie?

Your opinion was when judging our poor start in 2012/13 was that we were adapting to the premier league, nothing to do with player quality. Yet now when it's Fulham and WBA they get no such adapting period and it's simply justified by you that their players aren't good enough over an even shorter period than you claimed we had when we were adapting. Either you are using inconsistent benchmarks or you are lying about what the assessment criteria is. I'm puzzled as to why someone with who claims to hold a masters degree and prides themselves on pedantry fails to grasp this relatively simple concept.

In that 10 game period which you put down to us adapting to the premier league not form our back 4 contained Danny Fox, Joe Hoolivled and Kelvin Davis in goal for most games. So it isn’t based on player quality either. How can you assess the quality of Fulham and WBA players so early? Maybe they simply haven’t adapted to the premier league yet. You’re not applying the same criteria. Looks like that’s another lie to me.

I remember when we came up and we’re terrible for our first 10 games or so you claimed that in this period we were adapting to the premier league. So surely the exact same reasoning should apply to Fulham and WBA.

Ah the good old front sweeper days! I’d forgotten about that, thanks for reminding me of one of the most ludicrous football related posts I’ve ever seen.

On current form if Salisu isn’t the Ghanaian Vegard Forren then it’D have to be him and Verstergaard. By all accounts Salisu is quick and powerful, plus good with on the ball So could make a decent pair with big Dane.

Already equalled Carillos contribution then

Surely no debate now? Adams is becoming a good player and a great partner for Ings. If he could just improve his finishing a bit we have a very good striker on our hands. Still think he’ll score c10 this season which would be a decent return

Now pops up with a late goal. What a signing!

Download the universal TV app for your iPad or phone, has 4 or 5 good streams for every single sporting event. Thank me later