moonraker

Very simple, you have to earn it to pay it. I am sure the 90%, who using your figures only pay 40% of the tax, would willingly pay more if they earned the same as the top 10%.

should still abide by the same standards. He is always ready to call others out but gets very aggressive when asked legitimate questions about his own dirty dealings.

Tactical voting at play here, it is the answer to Reform for progressive centre and centre left voters.

being pedantic, this was a Sened seat, so has only been in existence since 1999, so Labour has not held it for 100 years.

Your assumption about my political views is yet another demonstration of your confusion, recognising a deluded nut job is not an endorsement of a political ideology, its basic observation.

No he is just confused by life

This chap

Skate bus sneaked in round the back

A must win for moonrakers family. Eldest boys 41st bd, he, I and younger son all attending and staying overnight in anticipation of great celebrations.

I remember that game, same age!

The original "new stadium" plan at Eastleigh was for 25k, most people thought that was adequate, the old adage, build and they will come has been proved pretty accurate in the case of St Marys.

I agree with most of what you say. My concern over terminology is the way it has been weaponised to score political points primarily by right wing groups and overseas controlled media. Based on your posts it obvious you are not conned, however by not challenging the language the con artists get an easier ride. I cannot verify your 1 - 10 figure for population growth. The process for assessing asylum claims has been, in general, in place for many years and proved to be effective. The rate of returns for failed asylum seekers is accelerating and this is a good thing, the greatest deterrent is to process claimants quickly, and send them back quickly. Fargage's latest "policy' announcement is so full of BS, he plays to the mob and the main stream media and the current government are useless at calling him out.

Absolute figures mean nothing, it is context, when we were in the EU the First Safe Country rule applied and there was zero or at least minimal small boat crossings. So yes Brexit has a a massive impact.

By definition asylum seekers are not illegal. They would only become illegal once their claim is denied and then if they scarpered, they are then illegal immigrants not asylum seekers. While many think it is simple pedantry to bang on about definitions it is vital to be accurate, the process is a legal one bound by national and international law. The British media and the right wing agitators have deliberately used incorrect terminology to whip up hatred and resentment. Don't be conned by the con men and women.

No it is not, very few aggressors secure long term gains in the modern world, ask Adolf, Mussolini, Galtereri, Pol Pot?