hypochondriac

I know what I meant when I posted it, there's no rowing back of any kind. I'll spell it out for you if you like. This burning of a mosque is likely done in response to the synagogue attack. That is not a justification for the act, simply what the perpetrators would view as a motivation. Rather like saying the individual who attacked a synagogue in response to the actions of Israel is disgusting. That's not excusing anyone who happens to attack a synagogue unrelated to anything Israel has done, that's your uncharitable interpretation of what was written. I've now helped you understand better what the meaning behind my post was as it wasn't cryptic. You can continue to suggest I'm lying and that I actually support some attacks on mosques or you can accept what I'm telling you. Either way it's on you.

Perhaps if you're having difficulty interpreting what I've written perhaps seek some clarification. I've told you the meaning of my post.

It's tiresome to have to repeat what I've already written but which but of the following post suggested that every wrong could be spotted or stopped? "Obviously the types of threat and the severity of the threat would change and you're not going to be able to prevent every terror attack but you'd change things as the facts change."

Lol. If I ranked a list of posters on here based on who I'd listen to about advice on attitude or opinions you'd be near the bottom. Above soggy though tbf.

I'm comfortable with the same cohort of people choosing to interpret what I've written in the most incharitable way possible. Maybe take what I've said at face value next time and when I've said what the meaning of my post was accept that's what the meaning was.

No I wasn't.

Because the person dpibg it would have been attempting to use the attack on the synagogue as justification for the attack when there is none. Truly bizarre but quite telling that you'd think I'd support burning down a mosque in other circumstances.

What a bizarre response.

Worth pointing out -again - that a call for a decent striker with a history of success in English football is not something that has changed in hindsight. Many saints fans were calling for this as the key position all summer. Despite doing some decent business elsewhere, this is ultimately going to cost us and it's on the board for failing to address that.

Yep. Should be looking for five wins really which let's be honest isn't going to happen.

Awful. Anyone committing crimes like this in response to other atrocities need removing from society.

I think we cross that bridge when we know for certain that Trump isn't going to do anything in response if Israel decide to blow the agreement up. First thing is to secure agreement from the Palestinians, get the withdrawal started and release all the hostages. Once that's done there should be immense pressure on reducing the remaining capabilities of Hamas and once we have that much of the justification for Israel continuing and remaining sympathy from the international community won't be there in my opinion. That's the moment for severe pressure on Israel and hopefully chiefly from America.

If we get full agreement from the Palestinian side and it's only Israel holding things up then it will be clear where the problem lies. He's famously unpredictable but I don't think Trump is going to stand for Israel messing things up and preventing his Nobel peace prize. Israel knows who has the power in their relationship.

I had a read some of the reactions to this deal. One positive is that many Gazans who spoke are blaming Hamas for the situation they find themselves in. Encouraging as waning sympathy for terrorists is going to make a deal that removes Hamas from power more likely.

What relevance is there in Hamas being involved in negotiations or not? The overriding priority is to end the genocide.

Is it calling for the UK to pursue joining military intervention in Gaza?

Then you can't really say if the agreement works for Gaza or not can you.

Eh? I read the article.

Which part doesn't work for Gaza? Ending the genocide, Israeli withdrawal, disarming the terrorists. That sounds great. I imagine the people of Gaza are desperate to end the genocide so will be welcoming this proposal to stop it.

In what sense? It is a real article yes

So it's not about ending the genocide then? It's about making Hamas feel good?

This seems like a good idea

Surely the goal of ending the genocide overrides all other considerations? Now there's a proposal on the table to definitively end the genocide. Everyone should be putting pressure on to get this accepted and for the genocide to end.

Why is there not unprecedented international pressure on Hamas to sign the peace deal and put an end to the genocide immediately? They have the power to end things now.

I sort of wish we had a nasty bastard in charge of the club above the manager who could make clear in no uncertain terms that our standards are not high enough and this is not acceptable. Say what you want about Birmingham's owners but they are already issuing votes of confidence in their manager and he's under pressure despite being above us in the table. We seem to be happy as a club to accept lower standards and mediocrity. Someone at the club hsould be going nuts and knocking heads together. What the fuck are these performances? You can't spend all that money and churn out rubbish like this! Totally unacceptable.