hypochondriac

Mixed feelings with this win. Fantastic smash and grab against forest who dominated the entire second half and will feel rightly aggrieved with some of the decisions. Fox was awful and got done numerous times. New defender was bad too heading straight up in the air. How forest failed to score more than twice I will never know. They were clearly better than us in the second half. Still we won and lambert was superb. Excellent result and the type we will need if we want to do well.

Damn I would have had that...

How on earth did you find this? Did you search parks?

Very interesting that Dr Who is a labour supporter. For the record, I am not a member of any party but at the moment it is the Tory party who I feel are the best choice to lead the country after the Labour c*ck up post Blair.

I suppose it depends what you mean by being a good singer. As a classically 'good' singer then yes I agree that Dylan is not great.

Blasphemer.

Whether you believe in god or not, that is a woeful interpretation of Christianity.

two hundred quid.

Yes apparenty that is all true. Few little extra bits too.

Don't really think it's the sellers fault but what should happen is you should get your money back and he should start a claim against UPS.

The united fans kicking off at the giddy bridge last year was ridiculous.

And on that note, st chalet? Can we finally put this thread out of it's misery?

I knew exactly what I was posting though didn't explain it very well. Apologies if you had difficulty following.

Because you accused me of not being a fan, because you started a thread harking back to comments made six months previously in a heat of the moment thread with ott comments in it from myself immediately after we have had another disagreement. You then claim it is nothing to do with me and you have no idea how I could come to that conclusion. Well that's rubbish as far as I am concerned. It has nothing to do with the cap fitting on my head. You have an argument with me and then the very next day produce this thread and then pretend that this was a total coincidence. You have a problem with people who post negative views which you deem to be over the top. Well I and others have the exact same problem except the posters I and others cannot stand are those with their blinkered positivity and those who do not allow discussion about a theory or piece of information deemed negative. For every poster on this topic agreeing with you, there is a poster who disagrees and it would be good if posters like yourself took notice of what was said by those posters and thought about what you post before criticising others. If you were prepared to accept that you were part of the problem then perhaps posters like myself would be more inclined to tone down our approach and be less confrontational. Sadly you think it's is everyone elses fault but your own. I am prepared to admit that at time I let emotion get the better of me and that on occasion I can provoke reactions. Are you prepared to look at the shortcomings in your posting?

Fantastic. Don't reply then.

If Derry believes that is fine for him to label people a problem poster then he should realise that he is also viewed as such by other posters. Having said that, in my opinion it is arrogant to label anyone as a problem poster simply because you disagree with what they say and how they say it and defend themselves. I don't think anyone is a problem poster as such, I do think posters like Derry would do well to be more open minded about topics on here but I would happily have a sensible conversation with him if he was up for it. I don't know why I am bothering to reply to you though tbh. It will probably give you the attention you crave.

I am interested in well mannered discussion about football and sfc. It's just that Canada saint and yourself get so offended by posters with an opinion they do not like, that they have to start threads like this designed to cause trouble (whatever he claims) or claim that the likes of myself is not a true fan. I want to discuss saints and theories about sfc in both a positive AND negative way with those prepared to do so. If you have no desire to do that then as you suggest, it would be better if you ignored me.

Theuglyinside has all the details from people who were there.

But in the view of many you are also a problem poster. Who has decided that you are the one who can judge if someone is a problem poster or not? How arrogant of you. I certainly won't be changing my posting style due to this thread and I would hope that others aren't scared by you and your mates and will continue to air their opinions, whether I agree with them or not.

Absolutely the best post on here. Sums it up perfectly. If only the positivity police were able to do that then the forum would not have a problem.

How can anyone think there is a positive minority on here? Many of the positive posters are the most militant in their views and least accepting of opposing opinions.

I want one with simply DFCSB on it.

If you read my initial responses, I said that my comments were ott because I was annoyed immediately after a game. I also said that I realised this the day after and posted as much at the time.

On this thread there are at least ten posters who agree. You clearly haven't bothered to read it and jumped in with assumptions. I'm allowed a right to reply and a right to defied myself against people posting rubbish as fact as you just have.

Great post and it would certainly make me think more about what I post if we had the likes of Canada saint being able to accept the opinions of others more readily.