hypochondriac

I wouldn't. The last paragraph is a joke.

He can be excused one bad performance I feel.

We must be good. Never thought I would see the day!

Absolutely brilliant. Survived a few hairy moments against a well organised but dull West Ham. For once we took one of the few chances we had. Far better that than creating loads but not scoring. Thought Kelvin was brilliant. Any idea why our second goal was ruled out?

Was excellent tonight. V.impressed.

Thanks send me some examples. May do for the future

Cheers Baj.

Excellent. Thank you Baj you are a gentleman. Any chance you could insert that onto the original background?

I need a black silhouette of the picture I put in the original post please. Picture exactly the same but just so it looks like she has been removed from the picture. I'll sort you out with a fiver if someone needs money for the job.

Very funny. Can anyone help me out? It's for children.

No.

Quite like Dora TBH though as a general rule, try to keep software on the computer that isn't from a TV series (unless it's a really well done educational game like Pingu.) Have a tiny amount of TV time per week and most of the boys want something car or digger related (Bob the Builder still the preferred choice.) All the children are absolutely obsessed with Peppa Pig World though, Paultons Park really made a wise choice when they opened that! I really need this for a poster, though I don't know how to do it on my mac.

I really need a silhouette of this peppa pig image here with the background untouched, just peppa in black. I will be eternally grateful:

Post 59 is the right answer according to Aaron Martin.

Bit rubbish that it is only the last thirty days though rather than say the last 200 photos.

Just got two in the chapel row JJ. It was the only place that they could get two together.

You are seeing things that simply do not exist. If you read this thread in its entirety then you will realise.

Wristslitters invented by certain posters to validate their incorrect opinion? YES

Yes but it's tethered. I'm waiting for the untethered jailbreak which should be along in a week or two.

Clearly federer's opinion. He tries miles more at the slams.

Are you saying you never have an initial gut reaction when you hear about a signing? I thought for instance that balotelli would be a bad signing for man city but I had never actually seen him play myself. Opinions like that are part of football.

Im not sure we are! . My stance is that both positive and negative initial opinion based on not a lot is part of football and always has been. I fully support both negative and positive comments about a player before they have played as long as the person making the comments is willing to change their opinions once they have seen the player perform over a period of time and is able to make a more informed decision based on more evidence. If we refrained from offering an opinion about a player that we knew little about every time they signed, then this forum (and indeed the pubs where these exact same conversations occur) would be a very dull place indeed!

I didn't see it like that at all. Why were people not condemning posters who declared themselves excited about the de ridder signing, and used the exact same criteria to form that opinion as they did to form their one about Jos? Why is it ok to think that a player may be really good for us based on evidence from other fans, but not ok to think a player may not be so good based on the same thing?

No one dismissed him. They offered an initial reaction. Many posters used the exact same criteria to comment on the signing of de ridder for instance, yet nobody made any comment about that initial opinion because it wasn't 'negative'. Can you understand the very obvious difference between giving your thoughts on a player signing before his has played and writing him off as awful before he has kicked a ball???

A thousand times this. No one wrote him off before he had played. If they had it was a very very very tiny minority (I think I saw one example on this entire forum.) people invent things that they want to be true in order to further their own argument or support their incorrect assumptions.