hypochondriac

Agree with this. Buzzin 'Orn used to do it, now that mantle has passed to saintandy and less so Super Mikey. Farawaysaint's reason is the best so far and is encouaging me to post here! (Use tapatalk)

That just makes me want to keep it for longer.

I disagree. In the position they are in where any alternative manager will just be surviving every year, it is a risk worth taking a potentially a great bit of business.

Davis not Davies, Adkins not Atkins etc

Once in six attempts. Poor.

Good to see derby lost too.

Coppell has a great championship record. Same cannot be said for Burley.

Which is a potentially cracking appointment for them. I hope not.

Sorry mate. Opted for the beanbag on groupon tonight. http://www.groupon.co.uk/deals/national-deal/infurn/1397956 Just unfortunate timing. All the best.

It was more to do with the fact that one of them has ms an so they were refused despite clearly demonstratin the ability to cope over a number of years and with that person having no relapses during that period. I do think it was a case of looking at the condition rather than the individual case. They got a young child and were obviously able to cope and gave them a much better childhood.

My parents adopted a child and found it very hard going. Almost not worth the effort though this was a good few years ago so things may have changed.

I see. Are you allowed to adopt with a criminal conviction? Anyone know?

Don't see why not, if he passes the required interviews and does things in the correct manner.

It's the internet. It isn't difficult.

Yes that is what I meant. It's working so it'll be out sooner rather than later.

OK well that makes sense. I imagine that already happens anyway.

I'm still struggling with what you're trying to say.

So what would you suggest? Anyone who displays a lack of judgement should have their children taken off them in the future for their own protection?

Did the judge think that? I genuinely don't know enough of the details.

Based on 100 cases you have been involved with. Hardly definitive though I accept your right to an opposing opinion.

If someone I loved came to me and said something like 'the police are trying to make it looked like I killed someone. If you just say I was with you then they will go away'. If I had a low IQ and was blinded by my affection for that person then I can't say I wouldn't do something similar and display a lapse of judgement. There is no suggestion that she knew he was guilty and lied to cover it up.

Yep.

As someone who works closely with chldren on a daily basis I am fully aware, however I see nothing in her crime that makes her a continuing danger to children. I don't know her and so it is difficult to make a judgement without a number of assumptions. There are many crimes that have come from a lapse of judgement but that doesn't mean that that person who had the lack of judgement should be permanently barred from having children in case they make an error in the future.

Amazingly I agree with you here.

I'm not sure I agree that one lapse of judgement on her part (however bad that lapse was) means that a woman is then in the minority if she doesn't make that same error again and I'm not sure that 100 cases that you have dealt with proves your point, but we will have to agree to disagree