hypochondriac

Where did I say that? I am, aware there is no choice but labour at the next election it doesn't mean that it's not possible to discuss the positives and negatives of that decision.

Someone saying "her" to a man out of politeness doesn't mean they don't know what a woman is. Not that I'm particularly interested in defending Sunak as he'll be gone soon.

I don't want anyone in charge who can't tell me what something as basic as a woman is. The reality is he knows exactly what a woman is but is too cowardly to say so which says a hell of a lot about him too.

I don't think what the tories do at this point has much relevance. I would like the man who will be the next prime minister to be unequivocal about what a woman is though. If he can't get that right it doesn't bode well for a lot else.

Yes it's an absolutely insane answer that doesn't answer the question properly. Hence why it keeps coming up.

It was a joke based on his inability to answer a simple question. The fact he still hasn't answered it invites ridicule and mockery.

"I do think continuing to question Kier on this specific point has merit."

Shudder.

Gave us the cold shoulder.

I believe he was making a comment about Keir's inability to properly answer what a woman is. I'm happy for continued discourse on this point until Starmer answers it properly.

Probably some truth in that. I do think continuing to question keir on this specific point has merit though as he still hasn't managed to formulate a proper answer and it makes him look ridiculous. Saying adult female human would have allowed him to move on months ago.

Had keir actually managed to answer what a woman is before now, the question wouldn't have been relevant.

Is highlighting Starmer's inability to define a woman not a legitimate topic of conversation? I certainly don't advocate for a system where MPs censor their topics of conversation for fear that someone in the gallery could be offended. She also wasn't in the gallery at the time so no harm done.

I ignored your posts for over a year. I didn't engage with you once. You referenced me many times over that period.

I can't remember half time music being so obnoxiously loud in a long time. It's actually giving me a headache and means I have to shout to be heard by the person next to me.

They also called for the head steward to meet someone in the control room. I'm guessing it's security related.

Meghoma has been excellent so far. Otherwise not much to report. Ref very inconsistent giving us a booking but ignoring the much more blatant foul from the Watford player.

At the game. Stadium announcer says "Mr Saint has left the stadium" which I assume is a code of some kind. Would be interesting to know what it was.

I can't speak for. The others but I know Surman is an athlete, takes great care of himself and got top marks in all his exams so is very intelligent as well. Combined with being an all around nice guy, I'd say he'd make a very good coach and role model for younger players.

I think your final sentence has cracked it. It's a load of unnecessary waste to make them feel better.

I don't agree that race should be a factor in hiring decisions. I don't agree with racial equity officials in companies which causes division and disharmony and is the inevitable consequences of forcing companies to publish pay data based on ethnicity. I don't think identity politics is a healthy thing to engage in.

Yeah that's exactly what it is. Genius.

This sort of stuff is what makes me nervous about Labour. No matter how much Starmer's tries to knock the edges off, we have divisive identity politics and oppression Olympics stuff coming:

didnt he have some dodgy listen and believe claim when someone was alleging that MPs were paedophiles? I can't remember all the details. Certainly didn't seem alright at that point.

Woukd much prefer arsenal to win the title over pool or city so that's a good result as far as I'm concerned.