hypochondriac

I didn't say that. I'm just pointing out the absurdity of suggesting that you can't appoint a manager because they've been sacked.

Tijuana Tim

They loved me over on sotonians.

Exactly. They aren't being brought up to discuss them or their ideas, it's to baselessly smear other posters by stating that they support them with no evidence.

Pretty clear who has the obsession here.

Posters who most frequently reference Katie Hopkins (based on visible thread patterns) 1. sadoldgit Easily one of the most common names in any thread involving culture-war figures. He often references her in discussions about: right-wing media misinformation comparisons with Tommy Robinson satire of the “alt-right” ecosystem He mentions her a lot, often as an example of extremist commentary. sadoldgit — almost certainly the most frequent He regularly refers to Tommy Robinson in debates about: far-right activism misinformation online radicalisation comparisons to other extremist figures media coverage He often uses TR as an example when criticising certain political behaviours or arguments. He appears in virtually every TR-heavy thread. If you had to pick a single poster who mentions TR the most, it’s him. sadoldgit — almost certainly mentions Farage the most He is extremely active in: Brexit retrospectives GB News criticism threads about populism discussions on political misinformation culture-war analysis Farage comes up constantly as an example of: right-wing populism grievance politics media manipulation Brexit campaign tactics Because SOG posts huge volumes in these threads, he ends up as the most frequent Farage-mentioner on the forum by a wide margin.

You're the only one who ever mentions Hopkins and you've definitely mentioned Tommy Robinson more than anyone else on here.

Bizarre thing to say. Virtually every manager in football has been sacked. As an example, Eddie Howe has been sacked in the past "for being shit" but no one at this point would suggest that means he wouldn't be good enough for us.

No one said that in this thread until he brought up Katy Hopkins and Tommy Robinson unprompted. Again.

Or referred to them as 'a trans'

He also said the Nazis were Christians because they had Christian belt buckles and that we definitely shouldn't have attacked Islamic state and should instead have negotiated with them. Box of frogs.

Given the amount of posters on here, it would be a miracle if there weren't some jew haters too.

He's not the only one. I general I like to be charitable and give people the benefit of the doubt with their comments, particularly if they tell you what they mean because if makes for a better conversation. Not so with certain people who aren't interested in that which speaks for itself.

Why is this government simply incapable of being honest and transparent? I never thought they would be good but they are much worse than I expected.

Lock less people up for stupid things and be harsher on those who repeatedly offend.

Or lock up persistent offenders for longer so they don't have to do multiple trials for the same person.

Which posters? It is true that there are some posters on here that are left to far left. Some are pretty reasonable and others have some loony views. A bit like the average population to be honest.

The thing is no one other than Soggy has expressed any interest in the likes of Katie Hopkins at all. I saw that some people had posted previously that Tommy Robinson has something of a point on occasion but that t's mostly ruined by his thuggish attitude and his grifting for donations which I agree with to be honest. Farage can be called many things but he obviously isn't far right. If anything he's pretty scared of being associated with anything too extreme which is one of the reasons why he shied away from Rupert Lowe. Lumping all these individuals or anyone who doesn't vehemently disagree with every single word they've ever said into one box marked far right just highlights the low IQ of the person making the accusations and like someone else says makes it easier to dismiss anyone they disagree with.

Do you mean Biden?

That makes sense. If it was labelling people you were taking issue with then it would have been tough not to call you a massive hypocrite.

I'll try really really hard not to point out that you've labelled me a number of times now. Maybe you'll avoid calling me a racist or islamophobe in future?

I know what you mean but typically right leaning and left leaning views have referred to certain positions. Like whelk said small state and less spending is typically associated with someone more likely to support the Conservatives who generally have views more aligned with what is referred to as the right. I agree though that I find it odd that anyone would support everything a political party does just because you are of a similar political persuasion in some areas. In the real world, people on the right and left can be friends and have relationships and not give a crap about things like that. My wife for example has never given the smallest shite about politics and tends to ask me how I think she should vote come the election. I think you'd find that's a lot more common than these fringe weirdos hating other people because they have some divergent views on the political parties they are leaning towards at the moment.

You're clearly to the right on some issues and to the left on others. As most people are.

He does think that. He thinks I fit that definition perfectly and has said so on multiple occasions over many years.

This is what I mean @Sir Ralph. No evidence at all. Note that he calls me far right and a Tommy Robinson supporter and then says you share my views. That means he's calling you far right too. There's nothing polite about it.