hypochondriac

Genuinely don't think I've mentioned her outside of this forum since she was on big brother and she called her daughter India despite saying she hated parents who called their children after places. About a decade ago?

I think you need to bear in mind that the likes of soggy are often more insidious than other posters who are more blunt or more able to be honest when they reply to you. Soggy will happily throw around terms like far right, rape apologist, Tommy Robinson supporter but never actually provides any evidence of these claims. He just wants to smear by association because he thinks he is uniquely virtuous and caricatures people who disagrees with him or pretends they have said something they haven't said because it's easier to dismiss someone that way rather than having to engage with their argument or accept that someone can disagree with you on lots of things and not be Hitler. In my opinion it's much more cowardly to smear by association the way he does. He's done it.for a few posters for years. Luckily his smears aren't actually effective which is why he's often mocked and ridiculed.

He said the line! Nice to get a mention of the terrible trio before the end of 2025.

You have to be joking. Soggy thinks you are far right scum and wouldn't think twice about smearing and accusing you of all sorts. He's the worst offender by far.

Crud. Down to earth with a bump.

He's out sick every other week. That's my main issue with him along with being a bit questionable mentally.imo

If he wins today I'm not sure how you could justify giving it to anyone else. It's not just the wins it's the manner of them, it's not his fault he hasn't had to demonstrate winning after conceding because we've been too good to go behind! I always said do these three games and then make an assessment. He should get the job after today.

A player who is hard to love. Too unreliable and I'd have questions over his attitude. With Bragg, Jander and Romeu I'm not sure we need him.

I remember being at the den for a classic Lambert header from a cross. Great performance. Hope for similar today.

She's blatantly done it in order to appeal to her back benchers and keep her job. Country before party is a load of old bollocks.

Some talk online of Reeves having to leave as she's blatantly lied about this most recent black hole in order to push through big tax rises. I expect it's exaggerated but interesting to see if noise grows over the weekend.

Bazunu is still a crap keeper and we still need to replace him. I don't think we will mind but we absolutely should.

According to Adam we would only have to pay him off for a year max whatever contract we give him so the length doesn't really matter

I'd take that over the current mess. Conservatives and lib dems weren't great last time but they weren't the worst.

I mean if you win your first four games in the manner he has the I can see why people would immediately reevaluate (me included.)

Will be interesting to see how the u21s do now.

Who was that bellend of an analyst who said he had a bad attitude? I'd love his thoughts now!

I'd say it's maybe surprising for Labour but not surprising at all for Starmer the technocrat and his style of politics. I do wonder how much longer he will survive though and if any of these ideas he's floated or had a hand in will actually come to fruition (assisted suicide, no trial by jury, ID cards etc).

I'll look at the summary at the end. I can't be bothered with all the waffle.

You think I think that every move labour makes isn't reacted to enough? I'd say there's a fairly reasonable outcry for a large number of things labour have done. It's one of the reasons they are so unpopular and why they've frittered away their commanding election win in a year and a half. I've seen plenty on the left of politics react with consternation at this move against Jury trials though. I don't think it's a left or right thing. I'd consider it a very bad idea no matter who was proposing it.

So no one from the legal profession could object to this for any other reason?

Corrected for you.

You think every move labour makes is overreacted to. I would suggest you aren't entirely neutral here.

Leo Scienza is our king.

Like you say it's a separate issue and not one being proposed at the moment unlike this one.