hypochondriac

Can you dislike Diane Abbott without being a racist? Why does she provoke a greater feeling of dislike compared to other black politicians do you think?

100%. Starmer is doing exactly what he needs to by appealing to the floaters and ridding himself of the Fringe loons who make the most noise.

Positive news keeps coming with Starmer ridding himself of hard left headbangers and weirdos like Faiza Shaheen Shaheen and the ginger weirdo from Brighton. Maybe he is serious about making positive changes in his party.

You're hardly in a position to criticise the posting quality of others on here. You're nicknamed ain'tclever for a reason...

Couldn't agree more. Absolute madness to look to renew McCarthy's contract based on a small run of games at the end of a championship season. We have needed a quality goalkeeper since Forster (and arguably during his time as well.)

Nothing inconsistent at all. I react to ill-informed or nonsense posts or posters on this internet web forum. That has little if anything to do with listening to opposing viewpoints from people who actually know what they are talking about or have real knowledge of the subject they are talking about. Therefore I'm much more likely to listen to what Bassem Youssef has to say for example even if I disagree with him almost entirely compared to what ever sweary rant someone scrawls on this forum. Occasionally you'll get a few decent opinions and arguments on here but much of it only deserves derision and mockery and consequently that's what it will receive.

Was he at Wembley or was I seeing things?

In your black and white world yes. I entirely share all of his opinions. Simpleton.

Still struggling to see what is so heinous about him that you'd disregard anything he ever says. As whelk says, my guess is you'd be keen to disregard everything he says because he doesn't align with you politically. I'd prefer to listen to educated people I disagree with on subjects like Israel and Palestine so I have a better understanding of their perspective but everyone is different.

Even better so he should be fully recovered.

Should be recovered in time for the new season then and a potential loan move.

Just had a closer look at your link. Other than some phrasing that some may object to, most of that is fairly uncontroversial conservative opinion. Struggling to see why that would prevent you from listening to an interview of his. I disagreed with Norman Finkelstein but I listened to what he had to say regardless.

Guessing you didn't watch it? Might be better to actually see what is said rather than dismissing it with an Internet link. I listened to his interview and previously one from Norman finkelstein who gave the opposing view and found both to be interesting and worthy of consideration.

I never heard anything baiut bednarek wanting out.

Worth a watch for those with a more open mind:

Pretty sure he's recovered now hasn't he?

I reckon we could send him on loan and get at least some of his wages paid. Team morale and spirit is what is required next year and we don't want anything from the relegation season to taint that.

I did see that I saw some people saying they want Bella Kotchap back. He fucked off when we went down and then fancies it again now we've been promoted? No chance.

I haven't seen anyone saying they want Lallana. Let's not start creating any more saints myths.

Yes I think that's a bit silly really but then we've all posted things after a bad loss that were knee jerk and that we probably regret with hindsight. Had we lost at Wembley I'd wager there'd be at least some validity to the argument that we had essentially failed. Glad to say I didn't slag off the board after the summer because to be honest the team did better than I expected even if we hadn't gone up.

Or maybe it's the case that he wants to come here for the reasons you outline and also we believe he has shown at Brighton that he has something to offer us? Both can be true.

You annoy me just as much but I don't have poor impulse control so don't feel the need to throw around words like thick and cunt. Regardless we are just going in circles now. You seem to think that had dialogue from 24 years ago been successful that would have been the end of it and murderous death cults would have simply disappeared whereas I consider that view to be naive and fantastical. You display basically zero understanding of the position that Israelis are in and the level of hostility and threat they face yet lecture others on being unable to see another side.

I said that is how you come across and your posts certainly exude a level of anger and bitterness even if you don't feel it in real life. I tried rsther hard to avoid any personal attacks on you earlier in this thread but you have been relentless. Seems we are in agreement. Similarly, I have no time for anyone close-minded who is unable to handle opposing opinions and who thinks that conflicts like this one can be resolved by having a chat, who thinks that Israel are allowed to respond to defend itself but only in a way that you consider acceptable (and in a way that you haven't outlined.) I have little time for people who continually refer to others as thick, cunt, idiot etc and then complain that other posters are getting too personal, it's completely hypocritical. You also go out of your way to defend awful people like soggy.

I'd widen your mind a bit love, otherwise you come across as a bitter and angry individual who can't handle opposing opinions. It might be good for you to gain some insight into others who disagree with you without getting upset and sweary then you might actually learn something. Do a bit of research of your own perhaps.

How many dead terrorists is acceptable in your eyes?