hypochondriac

Well said. It's incessant.

Using that logic, which government in British history has won with over 50% of the vote?

Sorry but labour's "vision" has been resoundingly rejected. Soundly defeated by an electorate that hated what he was selling.

You have no evidence for that at all it's just your bias talking. You have no idea that the role Cummins is playing is substantially different from previous advisors or if it would have differed from Milne under Corbyn. It would almost certainly have been worse seeing as Corbyn is clearly not a bright bloke- his ex wife saying he had never read a book etc. He's also clearly quite a passive man, certainly compared to Boris who may have his faults but is hardly a shrinking violet.

Advisors are allowed to advise just as previous advisors have held prominent positions in governments. You can't tell me that if Corbyn had won that the likes of Seamus Milne and Karie Murphy wouldn't have done similar. You're just bitter because Dominic has absolutely smashed it and been proven right for this election. #classicdom.

A hideous woman and a liar considering she said she would leave the country with Boris as PM.

I'm not sure why there's a pretence of a contest. No one moderate is going to get in, Rebecca long Bailey has it sewn up already.

And yet all we ever hear for the last three years are economic arguments to remain in the EU.

Fascinating insight about why Labour lost the election from someone who knows his stuff:

What I will say is outside your posts I've never seen Tommy Robinson and Katie Hopkins names mentioned so much. I barely knew who Katie Hopkins was until you started going on about her. If I cared to look you must have mentioned her dozens of times in the past couple of years. Seems you're the one with the far right fixation.

It's a pathetic lie when applied to people on here that you've used as an unsuccessful attempt to smear posters and discredit their valid opinions. It's actually worse than a childish insult because you're serious about it.

Sorry mate but you're deluded. There's a massive scale between Stephens improving and having a couple of pretty good games for us and Stephens playing for England or even being a regular starter for saints and performing well regularly.

Or one loss if villa beat Norwich.

Nope. I thought we played alright but it's undeniable that villa were a load of rubbish and played totally into our hands.

I'm not sure even that's true. If he starts performing solidly every week then maybe but he's had maybe two or three fairly good performances so far? Certainly not enough to definitively say that he's anywhere near good enough for our team.

I had a gander on a villa forum and they were all saying that whilst he scored a good goal, otherwise he generally wasn't great and they gave him a pretty low ranking. Overall I'd have to agree, whilst he's clearly a decent player, Saturday was not his best game.

I thought Grealish was rubbish apart from the goal. He's nowhere near the England team for me and probably needs to move in the summer to play with better teams if he wants to play internationals.

Also worth pointing out that Targett was sh*te and was at least partly at fault for the first goal. I'm glad we sold him.

People go through mad swings on here. After the west ham game people were saying we were relegated for definite, now we get a win and there's talk of an England call-up for Stephens. Can we just have some realism please which is that Stephens has performed alright recently but we still have one of the worst defences in the entire league. He would get absolutely nowhere near the England team and rightly so.

Odd that you'd consider a striker to be the priority. It's obvious that cm and cb are the real areas that need improving. A big striker would be a nice to have.

It's posts like that that come back to haunt you.

Ffs this is going to ruin my weekend if we don't win this now. Its so much worse when this sort of thing happens. This second half is going to be horrible.

Tbf it would help if Corbynistas accepted some of the reasons for their losses. Many of them are still in denial about it now.

Nonsensical drivel as per usual. I don't want to feed the troll so will respond no further.

Oh you mean like how you throw around terms like far right at anyone who disagrees with your mad opinions?