hypochondriac

My brother in law is a recently retired ex professional and he's not blessed with brains. I expect he'd look at some of the nonsense spouted on here with poncey language and laugh.

It's depressing looking at our backup options. We have very few options off the bench of we decide to play our best team.

I don't think you're too wrong. I do think this could be the season we finally do what we've been threatening to do for a while and get relegated.

But we will most likely play Mccarthy, Walcott, djenepo and Stephens. Ho hum.

It's relevant though because Qatar has helped fund the Taliban.

Well exactly. I don't think we need any more attacking players this summer. I do think we will regret not getting a dm.

Yes but I'm thinking about what's realistic. I think we can avoid relegation without a ten or a keeper, I don't think we can without a dm if romeu or jwp is out injured for any period.

Cahill and then a DM would be my preferred option.

And how weak we are if/when romeu gets injured or suspended. Personally I think a dm is what we need most.

What a horrible racist.

Forster Kwp new CB Salisu peraud Livramento jwp romeu Armstrong Armstrong Adams Isn't a bad team.

Well he's not wrong...

A footballer with a bit of personality. Who would have thought it.

Finally an issue that those of all political persuasions can unite around

Soggy would be shocked if he knew my voting record.

It's weird that this so called pack seems to target you more than anyone else. I wonder why that is?

So exactly like I said then. Further investigation may have provided more evidence to suggest that the attack was to further a political ideology.

I'm not sure that's true. Loads of terrorism is from religious ideogy and would occur regardless of any oppression or occupation.

People apparently lose their sense of humour when someone uses a thread about the Plymouth shootings to point score yet use the phrase "living in your head rent free" and that's apparently a slur against mental health. You couldn't make it up. You're a nasty piece of work soggy and your latest post underlines that. You get annoyed at Lighthouse because he moderates fairly and that means correcting or removing a lot of your posts because you regularly cross the line.

They should never have been invaded but I think the point is that once you have interfered you have a duty at the very least to at least attempt to leave in a proper fashion. If it is the case that the Taliban had bribed various officials to provide a seamless and unchallenged march to victory as soon as the US left, then its a rather monumental intelligence failure that this wasn't recognised and plans made sooner to get those who helped out. German officials essentially saying "well we didn't force them to help us" about Afghan interpreters is pretty disgusting and isn't going to encourage local assistance should invasions ever be required in future.

"who do they think they are" define "they" in that sentence.

Well there's quite a bit of that I disagree with so I'm not sure we do share the same opinion I'm afraid.

I might have been labelled as such by some but anyone labelling it would have been incorrect until such time as the facts became clearer.

Told you he'd say it was all a big joke didn't I. Hilarious to start calling people far right just after a 3 year old has been shot and killed.

Sounds very similar.