Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    44,705
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. I'm not sure he's meant to be a likable character.
  2. Fraser is great. Never found Friends funny though I'm afraid.
  3. Not sure about that. I'm Alan partridge had a laughter track and it's hilarious.
  4. Fair enough I don't know. It's certainly reduced their ability to make a profit in the future.
  5. Friends is one of those largely unfunny American shows that is just something you stick on in the background whilst doing something else. Like the Big Bang Theory or Two and a half men which is also very unfunny but wildly popular in America in particular.
  6. Genuinely asking as I don't know the details but my understanding was that this new act encourages tenants to challenge every single rent increase and it then gets frozen at the original rate whilst they appeal which could last a long time. On appeal the rate can never go up only down or stay at the new proposed rate. That's going to make it pretty difficult for landlords who even want to put up prices at a reasonable rate to keep up with inflation for example.
  7. Customs Union without EU membership makes no sense at all.
  8. People mostly like Bob Dylan because he was all political. Lots of his songs were covered better by other artists anyway.
  9. True I quite like that one as well and it's quite catchy. Like you say, quite a few of the others not really to my liking.
  10. I've really triggered some people because I don't fancy bob Dylan. In fairness I did say I was slightly biased because his live performance was absolutely awful.
  11. We don't need Dibling and Everton aren't sending him here. Jwp I'd like but I doubt will come. Gk is the main need.
  12. Keeper on loan, 6 million on a striker and 4 million on a defender would do me. Aribo and his big wages out for 2 million, 5 million for Edozie if we are lucky, Edwards maybe out for what we paid and there's a good chance we could make a small trading profit in January.
  13. I hope not because we really don't need to and I'd rather keep the money for if we don't go up next season. We need a keeper and possibly a striker and defender. That's it.
  14. Unfortunately I've been negatively influenced by seeing Dylan at the guildhall about a decade ago and it was the worst live performance I've ever been to. You couldn't distinguish any of his songs and whilst I'm glad to have seen him, it's not something I'd really do again.
  15. We were alright. Shame we couldn't get the win but that happens sometimes when the other team has to shut up shop. Overall a good point and keeps us in the playoff hunt.
  16. Just watched and it was a joke as expected. Paul ran round the ring without fighting with the commentators saying ridiculous things then when he tired he predictably got beaten.
  17. Indeed. It's a circus act not legitimate boxing at all. If you're going to stay up and watch a fight then you hsould have gone for beterbiev bivol which was amazing.
  18. He's two stone lighter and miles smaller. It's actually dangerous.
  19. They would also be morons. I will check the highlights the next day the same way someone might watch wwe.
  20. Anyone not in to boxing who stays up to watch this fight is a moron.
  21. If you invest money sure. I was talking more about a young person sticking money in a pension scheme. At that point the retirement age will be nearer 80.
  22. TBF though when young people now get old their pensions will essentially be worthless no matter what they save.
  23. Surely the answer would be to negotiate some sort of reasonable renumeration for the original owners of the land. Why are Mauritius involved at just because they happen to live nearby? My guess is there's some sort of spy shit we are doing on there which they don't want to admit to publicly so this is an easier way to do it without scrutiny.
  24. I'm not trying to be funny but can someone explain this situation to me? I think I read that Mauritius have never had a claim to the land. We kicked out the people who do and now we are not giving the land back to the people who always lived there but someone else instead and we are paying to rent the land off then when they've never owned it before? Is that right?
×
×
  • Create New...