hypochondriac

I expect lemona is different although we got an option to buy for him didn't we? I'm told we want hoedt to go but I think the wages are the issue.

Yep. Saints really keen to get any of the people they don't want out. Prepared to accept pretty much anything for them.

Like I said I was told mid October so it wouldn't surprise me. No idea who we are talking to but we are in discussions.

The midfield was the main issue today. Zero dynamism and the attackers had no service at all.

Following that logic, do you think Gao would be disliked if he was putting money in and was vocal about his plans to fans? I mean liebherr was a foreigner and no one had a problem with him. What if he had been exactly the same but a Chinaman?

Racist.

As a man who has 1/200000th of my dna as indigenous American, I'm offended by the term "American." I'd prefer "descendents of redskin oppressors". Cheers.

Reading this thread reminded me of the time that insane poster tried to say that using the word Chinaman when describing Gao was offensive and racist. Lolololol

The sfc ultras should start mobilising in anticipation. If he outlaws face paints and jester hats then we will know we are in trouble. Dark times.

One thing I will say is that the bloke who told me about this strongly believes that this is a good thing. I'm not sure myself.

I wouldn't think so. I was told mid October like I said earlier so seems unlikely.

Proba ly want a statement of intent and view it as an investment? To be honest though we really don't need a load of new signings. Three at the max.

I just knew about this a few days ago hence the earlier allusion and the thread bump. Ndas have been signed by people I talk to and a person on here who would know so not much else to say. I was told that kat is happy though. Again not sure if that's a positive for saints!

Is anyone surprised to hear that? Im not sure that a takeover is necessarily a good thing. I personally hope we don't buy a load of new players whe and it goes through.

How interesting...

I was told the club want him gone and that he's going so will be interesting to see what happens.

Oh ffs. They should just have some sort of steamy homoerotic gangbang in the Liverpool dressing room and get it over with. This is the cringiest thing I've seen in months.

I was told October. Would you agree with that?

As I understand it, the so called breaking of the agreement only applies in the event that there is no deal (I could be wrong.) Therefore if it happens why would the EU care about any perceived loss of global standing from the UK because they won't have a deal with us anyway?

Sounds like Sir Bill Cash inserted some clever wording unnoticed into the withdrawal agreement in case the EU tried any funny tricks. Seems it may have been kind of genius with hindsight.

If we followed it and allowed the EU to block rest of UK to NI food imports then imo that would be worse than breaking this treaty. Neither is particularly palatable tbh they were fools to sign the thing in the first place.

Blimey. I know its the sun but if this is true no wonder the UK went down this route.

John redwood makes some interesting points here. I'm not informed enough to know how true it is.

OK I tried to reply to you in a sensible manner but I see you have no intention of having a serious conversation.

I think the government should not have signed up to the withdrawal agreement if they weren't happy with it so I agree it's poor. However, you could argue that when Boris came in he was left with little choice at that point. I certainly don't want the EU trapping us and forcing us to accept their rules on state aid by the back door so if it's that or this rule breech then I'd go for the breech. It's not really an ideal situation though and hopefully there will still be a deal so it all becomes irrelevant.