hypochondriac

Bizarre non sequitur but if you have to write something incorrect I'll resist the urge to refer to you as a moron. Maybe best to stick to the subject of labour? I know you far left types love a deflection.

Here's just a small list of the issues with labour at the moment

Tbf he does have a point. I'm surprised we haven't had a mandated club pr interview yet.

Can't disagree there. One big problem though is she seems to equate all valid criticism and ridicule she receives with the very worst racist abuse she unfortunately suffers.

Oh but I thought the hard left were better than that? I didn't realise that corbynistas are only kinder and gentler when it suits them and only if their political opponents are kind otherwise everything is fair game. So much for principles then. Oh and Diane Abbott's complete incompetence is worth repeating wherever possible. Let's not forget that she'd potentially have one of the most powerful jobs in the country and the fact she can't tell her a*se from her elbow is highly relevant.

Nope. I've actually. Met cabbage face and I know they are not the same. He's an old poster who was on here years back. He was the "Kenyan" fella though.

Because it was staggeringly obvious that when he said "free" he was talking about not spending serious money in the form of a transfer fee. Only mlg- and yourself seemingly- is unable to understand and not for the first time. Oh and lol at "beating" on mlg.

Oh god seriously? Thank goodness you were here to point that out. I was under the impression that loans were entirely free! Well that has certainly changed my outlook on football. Thanks very much.

An utterly brilliant riposte there and yet another example of the kind and tolerant left with their gentler brand of politics. Here is that insufferable leftie James O'brien outlining the problem quite nicely. If this issue can get me to agree with someone like James then that really should tell you something. No doubt your next response will be to shout about morons again or something equally asinine https://youtu.be/ky-t3y2y6J4

Heisenberg isn't cabbage face. He's original Bournemouth Saint and Glasgow.

Have to agree with that. Also just bringing in one defender and concentrating our relatively meagre resources on midfield is a bad idea. I fully expect us to bring in at least one more attacking signing but then I fully expected us to bring in a cb two January's ago and a heck of a lot more signings last January so I'll likely be disappointed again.

No I meant things like organising an event on Holocaust memorial day that led to Israelis being compared to the nazis and failing to adopt the definition of anti semitism that pretty much everyone else has been adopted for fear that corbyn himself would fall afoul of the definition.

Words are cheap and it's his previous action or lack of action that he is judged by.

I can't see how. Now that the hard left have taken over he will simply be replaced by a similar mouthpiece. The only way we will get a more moderate opposition will be if the party implodes, splits or actually gets in power and is subsequently rejects a few years down the line.

You're just being wilfully ignorant now. There's a huge different between introducing a topic and discussing it's wider context and continually engaging in whataboutism and pointing fingers at other political parties in almost every post whenever the topic of anti semitism is raised on a thread about Labour. I know you know the difference and your long posts talking about my post history are just another deflections tactic to avoid labour's anti semitism problem. In related news, I see corbyn has come out with another bone headed statement this evening that has been condemned as wholly inadequate.

Stop following me around the board soggy.

That would make sense if there was a natural evolution of this thread to discuss the tories. The fact is there hasn't been and time and time again corbynistas including yourself have done everything they can to change the topic from the problems within the Labour Party. Of course different topics can be discussed in threads but that isn't what has happened here. Your agenda is clear and corbynistas clearly want to do everything other than discuss anti-semitism within the Labour Party nor the fact that they haven't adopted the definition because Corbyn himself would be guilty of anti-semitism under that definition. Watch now as you go and write another post about a separate political party or attack me for something unrelated to Labour.

On a thread about Corbyn and Labour, numerous posts not addressing any of the issues regarding Labour and instead trying to focus on wrongdoing in the Tory party. Just comes across as complete deflection I'm afraid.

It appears that on a thread about Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party, corbynistas can barely make a single post without referencing the tory party. You'd think they'd be more interested in their own party than the stuffy old tories.

Highlighting hypocrisy has nothing to do with snowflakes.

The kind and progressive politics of the tolerant left.

We were talking about it because this is a topic called "Jeremy Corbyn and the death of the Labour Party". Its hardly surprising that a topic called that would primarily be about things that are happening in the Labour Party. Continually trying to move the topic away from the Labour Party on a topic about the Labour Party is perverse.

Ain't that the truth! Nail on the head there.

But we weren't, we were talking about the problem of anti-semitism in the labour party. Just because every post from a Corbynista is seeking to exapnd the topic to other political parties in order to dilute what is clearly a serious issue doesn't mean that that was what was being talked about. Defenders of Corbyn seem unable to discuss the anti-semitism in the Labout party without also discussing unrelated unsavoury elements within other political parties.

Some of the apologism, whataboutery and frankly denial on here is very amusing. All it would take to largely solve this stuff is to adopt the definition of anti-semitism in full and to take a hardline disciplinary stance against anyone who airs views that fall within that definition. They don't do that though and I wonder why that is? They may eventually adopt it after this entire PR nightmare but it's extremely telling how slow they have been to actually take any of this seriously. Nobody seriously believes that their failure to properly implement the definition was because they were making it MORE robust. It's because they don't think those things in the definition amount to anti-semitism and the implication is that you should be allowed to make those claims and not be criticised or disciplined for them. The main defence on here appears to be pointing at supposed islamophobia in the Tory party as if that has any kind of relevance to any of this at all. It doesn't