hypochondriac

Imagine what our lack of resources are going to be like next summer if we do manage to stay up but we have no big money player like vvd to sell...

Doesn't sound like the other itk k Billy agrees with you there. Is he a fanny who wingers and cries?

We've followed a similar trajectory to Swansea actually. They came up playing exciting football with a squad of excellent players for their size. They then went down after falling behind their rivals and having a squad largely made up of dross.

Shaky in defence, pedestrian in midfield whilst losing our best provider of goals and virtually non existent up front. It's not looking good at all with our only saving grace being that Hughes is unlikely to do as poor a job as pellegrino.

I heard we are signing Jan koller

Jwp out wellbeck in would do me

Just bizarre.

Absolutely. Tadic is a big miss and if we were to do worse this season then his absence will probably be the biggest reason.

Good post. I do think Boris could have been less abrasive with his words but like you I think it's a sentiment that many would agree with- maybe even a majority.

Certainly. The point he was making was that leftist types throw around these labels to everyone to the point that they are losing their power. He was not telling racists to be proud of being racist as your quote suggested, rather he was advising the audience not to allow these smears to affect them since they tend to toss them at everyone they disagree with. I'm not saying I agree with him by the way and I'm no fan of Bannon but that was clearly the intent behind that quote.

The questions have never been screened we just have a lot of morons who attend these events.

By all means give legitimate criticism of Bannan- there's a lot to criticise- but you've just taken his quote completely out of context there to make it seem like he was saying you should be proud to be racist which isn't what he said at all. It's something many in the media have done too and it just comes across as dishonest.

Don't bother mate. People say that every season and every season they are disappointed. We are done.

Awful. So disappointing.

Well that's very interesting. I agree 100%.

Are you suggesting that you know corbyn better than Margaret Hodge and Ian Austin? The only thing I said was that some people who know corbyn better than we do are of the opinion that he is anti semetic which is factually accurate. Whether he is or not I have no idea but as I said earlier, I don't think anyone on this thread has said he is personally an anti semite.

I'm failing to see the relevance of that to my post.

My initial statement was neither silly nor over the top. You really should just accept that you misunderstood what I said and assumed I said all Muslim women when I said nothing of the sort. So that bit was wrong and the bit about the five sources was wrong too. Let's move on now that you've been thoroughly debunked.

And nowhere in your quote have I suggested that all women who wear the niqab burka and hijab have been forced to do so. I accept your apology. And it was five examples from five separate news sources. I won't be going back and linking you to each one though because as I said earlier you aren't actually interested in them and you've been proven wrong enough for one evening.

I'm not sure anyone on this thread has said that Jeremy Corbyn has been personally anti semetic- although people who know him better than any of us believe that he is. He's definitely been complete rubbish at ha doling the issue within the party though and incredibly slow to act which has just made the whole thing worse.

I'll take that as an apology and an admission that you failed to understand my post then. As you are fully aware, that was only five or six examples but there are many more that I could easily post onto here but you're clearly not actually interested in examples. My claim has always been that there are pressures on some women to wear the niqab and that it is a hated garment in much of the world by many who view it as a symbol of oppression. If you decide to read into my posts things that do not exist then that's not my problem.

I have done no such thing. You've clearly failed to understand what I've said. Given your history my guess is that it was a wilful misunderstanding but I'm happy to accept that you just made a mistake.

And I already told you that I accept that there are women who choose to wear the coverings so I don't understand what your point is. I told you there were women in the UK and elsewhere who are forced or pressured into wearing them, I knew you knew that to be the case. You goaded me into posting sources and when I found multiple sources showing that this was the case your response is that you can find sources that show that some women choose to wear them- a claim I never disagreed with.

Sadly not. From about five different sources so not just one perspective.