hypochondriac

I don't think anyone on this thread has denied that there are not extremists in all world religions- you'd have to be fairly dumb not to know that. There does appear to be a particular problem with Islamic extremism though which I think was the point being made (rather than any implied racism that you and soggy want to jump on.)

Sour mash has even confirmed that he wasn't referring to all Muslims right here.

I'm sure sour mash will be along shortly to confirm that the they he was referring to was not every single Muslim. I would have thought that was obvious as I believe he has mentioned that before but I wouldn't want to speak on his behalf. I don't share all of his views and I find some of what he says to be extreme but I haven't seen any obvious racist comments as yet.

No one is having a pop at you for supporting moderate Muslims. Not sure how many times it has to be repeated. I've posted already regarding that post reference. I haven't seen any obvious racist posts lately, I have seen a few posts that you have jumped up and down about and wrongly jumped to conclusions (no change there.) keep trying to desperately prove that I'm a racist though and I'll keep highlighting your idiocy.

Where was the word "all" in the post you quoted? No one used it. No one referred to all women in the post you quoted. Again you've read into it what you wanted. Until you know what "they" means in this context then you cannot call it a generalisation. I took it to mean extremist Muslims. You really aren't making any sense anymore and you're embarrassing yourself as usual.

Not sure why you are lumping me in with anyone else. No idea who my buddy is but I'm sure whoever it is can speak for themselves. I'll repeat it again because there may be a very slim chance that it will go in this time- no one has been "picked up" for supporting moderates. No one. I disagree there have been plenty of racist posts lately.

I'm not sure I agree with you there- certainly not the way you state it as a fact. As has already been stated, it is foolish to attribute the death to some anti Christian nutter before the motives are actually known. It's too premature to say that either way so in that sense it is an impulsive and ill advised post. I can't say it's racist or islamaphobic though, it is potentially another example of violence linked to Islam after all.

Agreed with that. Stupid waste of resources.

I've read and comprehended this thread perfectly thanks. It is you that needs a bit of self awareness and an ability to understand what other people post. But yeah you're just being attacked for standing up for moderate Muslims whilst everyone else can post what they like. Sure thing.

Absolutely no one is picking on posts supporting moderates. I don't agree with you that racist posts have gone unchallenged. I challenged a few obvious racist posts earlier in this thread. No one on this thread though has posted such ill informed and stating the obvious rubbish as you have on here and that is also worthy of being challenged.

Where? Seems to me you may be seeing implications that aren't there. Granted there have been a couple of obvious racists but they've already been dismissed earlier in the thread (no I'm not trawling through to find it- look for yourself if you like). The likes of sour mash may have posted provocatively but I don't believe that they've claimed that all Muslims are terrorists, simply that the proliferation of an Islamic culture in Europe has coincided with more terrorist attacks and may mean we are more at risk of this type of thing in the future. For the thousandth time that doesn't mean all Muslims are terrorists or that it's some novel idea to defend moderate Muslims.

Soggy still fighting the good fight, pretending he gets sh*t for defending moderate Muslims.

Hope you win the league mate. Preferably with a loss against us but if you have to beat us to do it then I'll take that too.

Where is that implied? One or two posters may have stated that at one point but just for the avoidance of any doubt anyone who actually says that and believes it is a total idiot. I shouldn't have to point out something so obvious but I'm doing a soggy and pointing it out anyway so I can feel superior.

Do you really think that when someone says "they" they actually mean every single Muslim? Does every post on here have to contain the caveat that not every Muslim is a terrorist at every opportunity? I think we've been over this point enough times on this very thread that it doesn't have to be repeated ad nauseum.

This is partly why I'm taking a break from this sort of ill informed nonsense. It's like banging your head against a very large wall.

Oh dear mlg. Utter fail with that religion tweet thread and now this. You're losing your touch.

That sentiment is shared by 99% of saints fans and is why he will get a heroes welcome whenever he comes back to sms. It's only a couple of weirdos on here that downplay his achievements or make out that it was such a simple task to get promoted twice in two seasons. The bloke is a saints legend and it's only on here have I seen one or two questioning that.

I didn't mention anything about me. I don't imagine I will boo him I'll probably just ignore him but I can't be sure in the moment.

I expect there would be more motivation than just premier league starts. The article does not say that would be his only motivation. I expect he would back himself at one of the other big clubs if they come in for him. I'd love us to get him but I doubt we will.

Don't see why he would come here if bigger clubs are in for him.

You maybe but the majority won't.

Is that confirmation that lallana will be playing? I'm not sure that's the wisest decision...

What a pathetic response. Can you point me to someone more qualified than yourself who has come up with a solution that you would be happy with? You haven't been able to find a realistic strategy but you are happy to rubbish or make fun of others who stick their head above the parapet and offer a suggestion.

Nope you've just ignored my post. At no point did I say my plan would eradicate IS, but they do have strongholds and that's what a broad coalition should target along with targeting their ways for producing money, combating their propaganda etc. Some troops on the ground (be that middle eastern troops or whatever) would probably help with this as well. We've spoken tough words but at no point have we sought to bring the disparate groups fighting IS together to make a meaningful difference. This plan would go a long way to reduce the capability of IS and hopefully prevent some of these types of atrocities in the future. Now seeing as you don't even have a plan, I'm going to say that what I've suggested is a slightly better plan than your non existent proposal. It's quite simple to pick holes in a plan that I've already admitted isn't perfect but you haven't even bothered to offer an alternative. Until you do, your criticisms of my plan lack credibility.