Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    43,377
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. Tbf difficult to know if that fits the definition of a terrorist attack- I thought there had to be some sort of political dimension. Seems more like a deeply misguided attempt to make money. Shocking crime clearly but it doesn't appear to be motivated by an extremist ideology. Good to see by the way that this thread has been quiet for a while. Maybe 2018 will see less major Islamic terror attacks in Western Europe. I certainly hope so.
  2. Better than Gallagher?
  3. Well yes but I'd rather see it in the prem than when we have been relegated. The author of the piece is right that we are currently the furthest away from achieving markus' dream than at any other point since our return to the top. It's pretty criminal that we haven't used Gallagher this year- he would have definitely been useful.
  4. I second this. It deserves a wider audience and pretty much sums up what we have been missing. I'm not sure about anyone else but given our troubles this year, would you rather see the likes of Gallagher and Reed on the pitch than some of the overpaid foreigners with no affinity to the club?
  5. He basically admitted he wasn't referring to Nice. Add to that Nice said he won't be sold this window and I can't see it.
  6. Nah I reckon they will sack him if we get bear the bottom of the league in February or March. Too late by then to save anything but they can say that they acted.
  7. No the fiasco that meant we didn't get a cb in and had to bring in a panic signing after the window in case we had any injuries.
  8. I'd have Hughes over our manager. I feel slightly envious that they have got rid and have a chance to save their season.
  9. Let's see what happens if we go more than one goal down against Watford...
  10. Absolutely amazing he is still here. The board need shooting.
  11. Looks like we may win which is positive but unfortunately the same problems remain and this result will probably keep him his job for longer so I can't be overly happy.
  12. Well there you go then he did act like a complete bellend. If what you say is true then at the very least he should have apologised.
  13. Why not sign him with a relegation clause that he can be sold if we go down?
  14. Not just you. I think it'd the nature of the prem that we have lost so many players in such a short space of time. For me, finding out that Fonte was such a bellend was a bitter pill to swallow. I thought that even if he were to leave he would go in the right way and leave as a legend. The fact that even he left how he did was incredibly disappointing. Only Lambert is the true legend to emerge from that time and since then I really haven't been that fussed about the players as they appear to all be the same spoilt rich kids only out for themselves
  15. Is this the opening of a blues song?
  16. Christ it never rains it pours being a saints fan.
  17. No evidence so far that anyone has started believing things are true in this case so you've been a bit presumptious there. I'm sure everyone is aware of the potential legal ramifications if they started defaming someone but that hasn't happened.
  18. Well yes it's quite obviously IF, hence why almost everyone has caveated their posts about the subject in a similar way. I assumed when you wrote your original post that you were suggesting that some people didn't realise this and were stating it as fact? If that isn't the case and you knew that people realised it was a rumour then the post is pretty unnecessary I would have thought as it's just stating the obvious.
  19. That wasn't correcting me. Not sure what you're getting at.
  20. Still don't see the posts where people are stating it as fact?
  21. Happy to be corrected but I thought it took a while before she actually assumed control. Prior to leaving I thought she let Cortese run the club the same way he had been doing under Markus.
  22. LOL! Show me where I have abused any other supposed ITK poster other than AR-10? We may well sign Walcott imminently but it doesn't make him less than an attention seeking fabricator. Most posters have a long history on here and rather like when Saint David was spouting his nonsense all those years ago, it's not hard to spot the fakes if you have a good memory.
  23. Not sure anyone has suggested otherwise. Hence the question...
  24. I'd still rather a shady billionaire was in charge than something like a fans consortium run by someone awful like Richard Chorley.
  25. Because he's a WUM and knows Jack Schitt (see what I did there?). The Echo this morning reported that he is interested but that Arsenal need to sort out ALEXIS Sanchez first. Hardly difficult to say that we have agreed things but nothing signed yet until Arsenal sort Sanchez.
×
×
  • Create New...