hypochondriac

I think a list pointing out what he has won (as opposed to erm every manager we have ever had who have won nothing of consequence) is a fairly persuasive argument against him being crap tbh.

Such a crap manager. He is beneath saints for sure.

if you say so mate.

I doubt it which is why I don't think he will come. If he does come though then clearly he will have been promised funds to a level that he is happy with (and to a level which has made him leave a champions league team) and that is potentially very exciting (as I said will almost certainly not happen.)

And anyone saying they would prefer someone with a lower profile so we can keep them longer, how did that work out with mopo? We should want the best person available and worry about the future when it happens. With some people they are almost saying they would prefer mediocrity if it means we keep our manager longer. I would prefer that we lose a load of players and maybe the manager next year than being near the relegation zone because it will mean we will have done fantastically well again.

Anyone who doesn't want mancini if he wanted to come here is leg mental.

If he comes here (which he probably won't) then he will clearly have been promised big funds and will be expecting to challenge for trophies etc.

Just because he has previously had a load of money and was able to buy players does that mean he is incapable of bringing through young players? The bloke has worked with world class players and would clearly be a step above the previous managers we have been linked with. If he were to come here it would signal intent and would be an incredible opportunity to turn us into a spurs or Everton for a number of years.

Some of you are mental. I don't think he will come here but if he did he would be an incredible appointment. Will raise our profile and probably attract all sorts of players that were previously out of our league. Would probably be a big success as well.

Am told that Roberto was in the Highfield (or whatever it is called now) two weeks ago but the person who saw him there thought little of it at the time.

I like this bit about mancini: Regarded as a cup specialist, Mancini has reached at least a semi-final of a major national cup competition in every season he has been a manager, from 2002 to 2013

The mirror are just full of rubbish.

They have bigged up the new manager so it better be a good one! Koeman is the obvious and most popular choice so it's hopefully him.

Why is that ironic?

I find it very easy but I totally understand that looking after children does not come naturally to many people and this they would find it very hard.

I thought it was an excellent article and articulated my thoughts perfectly. Each to their own though.

Chambers is excellent for his age. Shaw is miles better.

Again, why have the mods allowed Glasgow to reregister if he has been banned?

Rooney was awful again. Wilshire and Milner have both been crap also.

I'm still happy for rickie. I thought I would be sad but actually I was pleased for him. Great strike.

No different to now then in reality.

That would be brilliant. Where would it be held though?

Why is Glasgow allowed back on after being banned?

My mate got a phonecall asking why he didn't renew his season ticket yesterday. I wonder if these guys had anything to do with that.

When people say things like this are they actually just close to tears or is it just a figure of speech?