Clapham Saint

Any links for those of us tightarses without sky?

thanks

Does anybody have a link?

Does anyone have a link?

Egil Ostenstad in the supermarket (was it a Safeway?) in Portswood in 1999 or so.

It seems to me that the most important thing to RM is stetting up his team to play “the right way”, whereas the most important thing to a professional PL manager should be winning games.

Have you never heard of a "six pointer"?

Somebody who doesn't care how many people die...

Without seeing the contract we'll never know but the obvious solution would be for these buy back clauses to have an expiration date - which I presume that they do. That protects clubs in Saints' position by preventing clauses being used 10 (or however many) years later after multiple new contracts but also protects the club in Chelsea's position from having teh clause invalidated by a new contract.

Basically - if you need to draw lines to be able to tell then it is automatically onside. Sounds doable to me.

Whilst technically yes, tourists visit Auchwitz, calling it tourist attraction suggests, to me at least, a very different place/experience than is actually the case. I challenge even the most liberal amongst us to visit Auchwitz and not have it make an impact upon their outlook on life and make them reflect on how they view people who are different from themselves.

Took me a second read to realise what you meant by "take care of it". Thought you were referring to some sort of orphanage at first...

Interest is accruing though. The repayments not starting until 2025 doesn't mean that it isn't a good idea to reduce the balance before then (which we may or may not be able to do under the terms).

Congrats on the new job. One note of caution though. No matter how aggrieved person A might be it is rarely a good idea to "let rip" in an exit interview - although that isn't what you said that you were intending to do, it sounds as though you might be considering it. By all means let them know that you felt undervalued but I would try to avoid burning bridges unless there is no other option. Congrats again. B

I won't claim to be an expert. Some experience from the employers' side but that's all so happy to defer. My reasoning was that it sounds from the OP as though person A was seconded elsewhere - which implies that they would (in theory at least) be returning. If they were to return then there are now two people and only one role. Hence why I suggested that they might be both asked to reapply for the role as part of a process. N.B. Posts where people question why another poster said that they are wrong can often come across as unnecessarily aggressive. I hope this doesn't come across this way - I'm genuinely interested in why this doesn't work.