egg

You're struggling to understand that people don't want to debate this with you. It's tiresome. I say by way of comment only that reference to God does not have to mean the God of the Bible. Or indeed any God, often a term of expression with people refer to something they don't understand, or necessarily believe in. The extension of that is the irony that the God of your 'understanding' is a God that you don't understand or believe in. As I say, it's comment, not the starter for a discussion.

It's pretty straightforward to the rest of us mate.

He always does. When he's left to largely think on his feet he comes across brilliantly. It's when he's shoved in front of a camera with his script he sounds shit.

Workshop

I've tried to be civil her mate, but you've shown yourself to be a properly insensitive cunt with no self awareness. Like The Kraken, I'm out, and won't waste my time engaging any further with you on the subject.

Well said, and my thoughts entirely.

That you can't see the crassness of your posts says rather more about you than about those who've commented on them. "When you're likely to dig yourself a deeper hole, best put down your shovel" said many a wise man to many an idiot.

That's a classy touch. At times like this, rivalries must be put to one side. I can't imagine how he and his wife must feel, just awful.

You've made yourself look more of an idiot than usual here MLG. Sometimes it's best to say nothing. This was one of them times.

Handbags

13 year revival! Some blasts from the past on there. On topic, I favour a good old fashioned hammer and chisel.

From what you posted. You've said you expect us to get better for less money than we pay Forster. Unless they're free, we'd be paying a fee, but even free there'll likely be a signing on fee. Factoring that in, I'm not sure who you expect to get for less money who'll do better. You've seemingly changed your point to that you'd like us to splash cash on a better keeper. I'm with you on that, but transfer budget is not known and I'd hazard a guess we won't have masses to spend. If it came down, for example, to keeping Forster and spending cash on a another 10, or getting another keeper and not getting a 10, I'd be happy to keep him.

So cheaper, better, and presumably free. You don't want much!

So we're back to this nonsense. It's reasonable to assume that Forster is affordable to us, and that a better keeper would cost more. Thus, it's hardly controversial to suggest that we'd struggle to get better if Forster's wages are the level of our budget.

Contraction

Grinder

So a pundit who knows what he's talking about.

Twist

Ore

Failure

It doesn't and it can't. That's part of the reason that xG is such a nonsense - it doesn't factor in the lottery that is the reality of football, ie someone getting in the way, a worldy save, a foul, anything spontaneous or that otherwise just happens. It's nonsense.

Cheek

I didn't want Puel to go, but wouldn't have him back. That said, I'd have preferred to see a Puel organised team out there on Saturday than the shambles that we saw. There'd have been some fight and less goals.

Then have the booster.

"it's a fact that it was most likely to be 4-5 goals" Wtf is that nonsense? The only fact us that it was actually 6 goals. Anything else isn't a fact but an opinion.