egg

Perhaps my prejudice led to my conclusion!!

I'm not sure how you drew that conclusion. He was merely saying that the idiot on the bike nearly caused an accident. As they often do. Without insurance against their monumental risk to other, insured, road users.

Indeed. In short, Trump didn't inherit a clusterfuck, whereas labour did.

The shrinking of the US economy is apparently all down to Biden, and nothing to do with his loopy policies. Bless.

That creates a 3rd category, ie recognising transgender people differently to male and females. We now clear definitions of male and female and I'm not persuaded that it's necessary to seek to introduce a 3rd category in some areas of society.

I appreciate you weren't making a direct comparison, but your point was that as we have toilets for neuro diverse people, then we can make it happen for trans people, ie giving competitive treatment. For me the two issues are wholly different, and I support dedicated loos for neuro divergent people, but not trans.

Interesting. There needs to be a proper look at kids who feel that they identify as a different sex. Some will be correct, but it's bloody complex, and and some may be acting out either deliberately or as a result of something going on.

@Sarnia Cherie the Trans/Neuro divergent comparison doesn't sit well with me. A 13 year old with Autism doesn't decide to have it. A 13 year old who decides to be another sex is making a decision, and one they cannot reasonably make imo.

Lighten up mate... pun intended.

You've missed the irony...fill fields with solar, but dim the sun. That's got nothing to do with being against solar.

I say it's an Orange Tit.

What?!? Crazy, absolutely crazy.

"£50 million government funded scheme". Doesn't sound the best use of £50m to me.

The principle of sending people to a foreign land after they arrive here is very much akin to Rwanda. Housing people for for years somewhere does not that somewhere a "processing area".

Thanks for the explanation. So basically the Rwanda plan, or a variation. Pending being sent off somewhere these people need to be accommodated. If you're against the housing proposal, where are they housed pending transportation? A willingness to smash the gangs surely is a good thing? Not sure why anyone would take issue with that.

So what should happen to those people when they're here? France won't what them back.

Sorry @tdmickey3, not sure why you were quoted. I was replying just to LD.

So what are you saying should happen to those people who arrive from France? The French won't take them back.

A. We've established that you don't consider actual evidence to be necessary to spark discussion so I'll be be pleased to not see you ask "where's your evidence" each time you don't want to answer something B. You cannot simultaneously rely on the bible as evidence and call it fictional. Pick a lane. C. Quelle surprise, that's where your little fishing trip was heading. Try harder mate.

But Matthew, you're not a Christian, and this is a God, not bible thread. Please understand that. Regardless, you clearly wanted someone to agree that your bible based references were awful. You'd then have babbled on about an all loving God. Your angle was bloody transparent though and you were cut off at the pass. A poor attempt at trolling. On to your latest reply. A. You either insist on an evidence based discussion or you don't. Which is it to be? B. You've said that your questions weren't hypothetical, but now ask why you can't ask hypothetical questions. Were they hypothetical or not? C. If they weren't, is it the case that the bible is credible evidence if you think it helps you get a "gotcha", but bollocks otherwise? Feels that way. Anyways, your schtick is tedious and really transparent. You can only do what you do well if you're bright. Sadly you don't do it well.

The % was next to fuck all mate. Whether it was 0.05 or whatever, or 0.95 or whatever, I think it's been established that the take up rate was a poor <1%. Pretty desperate stuff when 0.90% or whatever makes a difference to your ego.

A ridiculous response which highlights your daft shtick. You insist on evidence for everything asked or said by anyone else, only to ask bible based questions but say the bible is fictional. Either you want to start discussion from a factual basis or you don't.

If the question was evidence based it would be understandable, but it's a very peculiar hypothetical question. Why ask something like that?

Got a link to the website mate? I'll have some of that.

The World Jewish Congress are nearly as pro - Israel as you are mate, hardly an objective authority. And top marks for mistaking the target of the criticism 👏