Dark Munster

Spot on.

Who's arguing with that? Of course they should. The creditors will be richer with 60-99p than if they get 20p in the pound (obviously). The point I was making is that it appears that Griffin would be working for the benefit of creditors, and not for the club (and quite rightly so).

I don't see how getting 60p-99p in pound back to the creditors, as opposed to on 20p, will make the club stronger. The creditors will be richer, but not the club, which will have to survive (if it can) on a shoestring.

A good summary of the similarities and differences between Leeds and the CHEATING BASTARDS. The big difference of course are the huge parachute payments, the promise of which is keeping the rotten corpse on life support.

Why would you want them to pass away peacefully? :cool:

AA: "If our proposals are not accepted on Thursday, we will adjourn the meeting for up to 21 days. We can then come back with another proposal. "But if that was not accepted, we would have to try to sell the club in administration. "There would be a risk of another points deduction for breaking Football League rules. "That, and the large debts, would make it very hard to sell the club. And if we can't sell, then it would be a case of closing the club down. Thursday is a huge day, but I'm confident we'll do it." In other words, if you don't play by our rules say goodbye to the club, the parachute payments, and you'll get sod all. He's bluffing, creditors! CHEATING BASTARDS

Your nipper is sharp.

Once every 4 world cups? :cool:

The most boring and bored commentator ever. When a goal goes in you can almost hear him yawning. They should use Derek Rae for the big matches.

Germany are masters of finding the easiest route to the final. Don't be surprised if they contrive to finish second in their group.

People are suggesting that AA and UHY Hacker Young could be finished by the end of this soap opera. But ask yourself: if you're a dodgy owner of a company that has to go into administration, and want to shaft the genuine creditors, who would be a better choice as administrator? Surely there could be a lot of work after this is all over? CHEATING BASTARDS

No. 97 all out.

97-9 from 18.5 Oh dear

From 93-4 to 97-8

96-7 from 17.4 overs Trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

96-6 from 17.3 overs

I'm not moaning. But I do like making odd statements. It's my Raison D'être.

And presumably continues to get paid whatever his hourly rate is. Talk about rewarding failure. CHEATING BASTARDS

I thought you lot support anyone who plays against England?

The same manager who had them beat Spain, Brazil and Portugal, and got them to the final last time. (Not that I disagree about the retarded bit).

.. and that has nothing to do a "who should play at RB" thread? You grumpy old sod. :cool:

They're planning to come to San Diego, I've heard, so they'd bloody well better crash before getting here. The Grand Canyon sounds fine to me, as long as they don't damage the ecosystem.

AA: "The Griffins offer is just not workable, there would not be a football club left." Sounds very workable to me, AA.

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=22494

Free money.