Mole

Of course they don't, but you cannot deny that the vast majority of fans want Lowe Out. The St Marys crowd made that quite clear on Saturday and as the saying goes "you aint seen nothing yet"!

It probably does have the largest membership but we don't know because they won't tell us the actual number. 838 it says on the website and you know as well as i do this is as out of date as the rest of the site. If they've got half that number of members i'd be amazed. But the views he expresses aren't the views of Saints Trust members, they are Nicks views. "I have spoken to a few supporters today and several of them have said the same thing, that when the first Doncaster goal went in it was the final straw and that was why the fans turned so quickly, I dont buy that" People criticise Richard Chorley but he's no different to Illingsworth really is he?

A selection of comments to Nicks ramblings: This "donation" from Wilde is news to me, can anyone expand on this?

Well you Lowe Luvvies at least have a spokesman now. The Saints Trust represents you so you all may as well join.

This says it all.

He speaks as chairman of the Saints Trust that has a website claiming 838 members. Nick Illingsworth therefore speaks on behalf of those 838 supposed members. He uses this mandate to elevate himself and his opinions to the local and national media. I have a problem with this even if you don't.

I dont blame Lowe completely for this mess Big suprise there Nick. i do content that there is a place and time for such protests and the timing yesterday was, lets say, not great. Like we give a **** what you think. I have spoken to a few supporters today and several of them have said the same thing, that when the first Doncaster goal went in it was the final straw and that was why the fans turned so quickly, I dont buy that Of course you don't Nick, you are god. the time for protesting was after the game not in the middle of it. Do shut up. I do understand what supporters are feeling and their frustrations You don't understand the feeling amongst the fanbase. I reiterate, Lowe, Crouch & Wilde would then have no say in running the club, appointing managers or signing players, all they would be responsible for would be appointing this Chief Executive, setting him a budget and then monitoring his performance to ensure he was doing his job properly. OK for some supporters it wouldnt be the total removal of Lowe from Saints, but it would remove him from the day to day running of the Club and accusations of interference. It would not remove any of them from accusations of interference you fool. If supporters want to protest they need to do it with a united front and before and after games, not during Like we give a **** what you think. The Saints Trust offfers fans a central point to rally round I don't think so.

The Saints Trust under Nick Illingsworth should be avoided like the plague for the reasons you have given. On their site it states the board is comprised of: Chairman - Nick Illingsworth Vice-Chairman - Steve Grant Secretary - Bert Curtis Treasurer - James Barnard Membership Secretary - James Jablonski Stephen Godwin Richard Bennett Robin Howard Chris Brown Alan Ediss Paul Radley Is this list how it is, or is it as accurate as the 838 members they claim to have?

Even the Daily Echo was told to leave the paved area outside the Itchen Stand by stewards, for being on “private property” Let's hope the Echo finally starts representing their readers now that they have witnessed first hand the feeling of their readers and the contemptuous way supporters are treated by the club under Lowe.

No he didn't.

This is a road that i feel would bear fruits.

What he may or may not have said doesn't excuse the fact that you betrayed a Private Message sent in good faith. You might not see this as being wrong, but others might.

Pre-pubescent humour isn't my forte, i'll leave it to one of your gang from the Muppet Forum.

Isn't there a "do you like marmite?" thread or something for you lot to post on?

Key People / Director Board Role Graham Lowe - Chairman Richard Ford - Chief Executive Nigel Gurney - Finance Director Mike Frame - Company Secretary http://www.hemscott.com/companies/company-summary.do?companyId=4005

Could you not ring around local funeral parlours and ask them to loan you a cheap coffin? Surely there must be a funeral director who is a Saints fan.

To be fair you need protests for everyone. The highly charged post match protests are fine, but to appeal to the masses you need a more "family orientated" strategy as well.

No, Lowe is the target man. Jan Paulsgrove is just a puppet when alls said and done.

And if you could Lawrie to take part and symbolically place his FA cup winning photo in the coffin it'd be a real scoop.

I do like the idea, in fact it's ****ing brilliant. I've got a suggestion though. What you really need is for this to be properly choreographed with pall bearers and a few mourners following the coffin in proper funeral attire for effect. I've got visions of Ted Hanky type dracula costumes being kind of catchy and someone walking in front tolling a deep big ben sounding bell. To ask everyone to come in fancy dress is too much. Kids might be up for it, but personally i wouldn't do it. That's why you need to choreograph the "main event" and just ask normal fans to join in the procession in black if this wish (handy for me as i wear a black jacket and jeans) but if not just to be there and add support.

If the club make protesting outside reception an issue i can only see it inflaming the situation. Rupert Lowe is a calculating man and i'm sure he'll consider the effects draconian measures will have. Lowe will be wanting to calm the situation in his own interests, inflaming things would not be a wise move. That said this is Rupert Lowe we are talking about and he's a bit of a loose cannon so expecting him to act wisely is perhaps asking too much. From an anti Lowe point of view it'd play right into our hands if he were to wage war on the fans by depriving them their right to peaceful protest as this stance would only serve to isolate him further.

I agree with point and it's a good one. I could be wrong and there may be something in the small print but as far as i can see it the reception area (bar cordoned off areas) is open to fans. If fans wish to gather to appalud Rupert Lowe or the team in this area i can't see the club having an issue and therefore i can't see the club having an issue with a peaceful protest in this area. Just my thoughts on this.

Did you or did you not manhandle a fan before the incident when you were decked?

I think what the mods are saying is that if you plan to do something illegal don't be a tw4t and drop yourselves (and potentially the site owners) in the **** by posting it on here. I think i know where this warning has come from and fully understand it. For that reason just be careful with PM's too. Not everyone on here can be trusted with the principle of a PM being a Private Message for example.