Window Cleaner

Amazing, I mean who among the club's administrators actually thought that that would actually produce any sort of result. An act of the purest stupidity if that was the only reason. Plenty of good keepers knocking about available at about a fifth of Forster's salary. Bloke hasn't been the same since his knee injury, should have written him off then and got whatever we could from the insurance.

Didn't understand the line-up, still don't. What exactly was the reason for playing Forster?

Probably because they're all playing too many games for the number of quality players that they have available. I mean look at Spurs, they've even had to dig Janssen out of the dustbin. If you want to go to the later stages of the European Cups and still perform reasonably in the PL you probably need at least 30 decent players. With the 25 man squad rules probably means you probably need 6 or 7 quality youngsters.

Know very little about him, despite him being at PSG in his youth years. At 35 million he looks seriously overpriced to me.

Don't know if that's even possible in our day and age. Life was so much easier in '76 and your team winning the Cup was a big, big deal. Apparently even in John Lewis in town everything went silent and stood still for a few moments when Stokeser scored. Wouldn't happen today I'd doubt.

Gripping stuff. Watched most of the Sussex innings and I'd have to admit that I thought that we're maybe a heavy duty bowler short just now. Fuller certainly gives you the jitters when the opposition are hitting out.

Why would he not stay? He's got the side playing better on occasions but there have also been some awful results. Can't see any really "big" side wanting him as of yet.

See we got our annual drubbing at Chelmsford then. Never mind 4 out of 5 is good.

Batting at the Aegeas looks a bit tough this morning, 3 down already and scoring mainly in singles. Probably why they put us in after winning the toss.

Don't really see that happening. Don't really care either way though.

Fuller got some useful runs today after we lost a couple of quick wickets. Didn't bowl because the spinners ground them down. Donald probably just needs some time, hasn't played much these last 12 months or so.

Markram looks to be a decent emergency signing then. Solid with the bat, useful with the ball.

Doubt it would be any different from an average Fresher's Week in the 70s. Except that you'd not be dead of course, mind you...

So what happened there then? Did the wicket or conditions atmopheric change radically or was our top order batting just duff?.

Ah bolloaks. Hants 15/2 both openers gone, probably to dibby, dobby seamers. Then again, Vince really isn't an opener and Weatherly isn't...well anywhere near good enough to be opening in Div 1.

Well I hope the wicket is as flat and lifeless as our bowlers (still no Fidel) are making it look. Yorks 519/6. Not scoring very quickly but we'll need some really solid batting for 2 days to get a draw.

1 I think, unless they've changed it this season.

Well we've got Ballance at last, caught behind off Berg. Tykes 371/4. Doesn't look like Fidel has bowled today, not an injury I hope.

Looks like it could be a good one not to lose. Big scores all round hopefully.

Struggling for wickets today.

Packed her trunk has she ?

But we won't so it's not a problem.

QUOTE=lickierambert;2725027]Good grief, we appear to have beaten Essex comfortably for the first time in a long time Ah but Wheater was out injured for all but a couple of overs. No bogey man, no horrendous loss.:rolleyes:

I don't see any team apart from Huddersfield, Fulham and Cardiff going down. The rest are just jockeying for the prize money.

Looks like we're going to lose more time to bad light, pity, we are in a strong position but we need to be bowling at them for all the overs possible..