Thedelldays

Not create jobs. But if an opening at a hospital came available there could be a scheme were it was offered to the benefits office and people who are fit and able to work should get it. Win/win of course you could argue that not advertising the job is not fair. Bit right now, we all face a massive economic problem an being fair like that should take a back seat for say two years

I'm happy that more and more fans seem to be ditching the 'striving for mediocracy' mentality.

I do not buy products that have a fair trade logo. In fact I don't even check.

It is a shame that an organisation like the NHS could not employ those who are "able to work" but won't in this current climate

Well I never.

About 2-3 weeks ago i was called unrealistic for thinking about the playoffs, funny how things turn-a-round

Just simply swap the word Tory for the word Jew and Hitler would probably have not agreed with you more.

Adolf? Says you that don't want certain people breeding

Sog It does seem that you are obesessed with what alps says.

Was the hod spurs reserve team manager?

Let's show some genuine top of the table league form before we say how great we have become. We have won 3 whole league games

We lost to rovers as we had no left hand side. Hammond and Morgan were both fantastic that night. We were crap down the wings

Morgan was fantastic against rovers and apparently very good against Southend. He is in great form at the mo

You would think but then you have foreign intelligence networks that would n ow they don't work properly. Again may as well not have them. Don't forget. It is not the warheads themselves but the rockets that carry them. Other nations develop ways if shooting them down over the years from what little intel they may get. So they will need updating etc

I would think keeping the deterent is something we have to do. More and more countries are developing nukes not discarding them. We have no idea who will be a potential enemy in 25 years time. North Korea, iran hell even Russia are very much a power house on the nuclear front and in other ways that I won't say that would make you a bit concerned. IMO the savings from the MoD should be made at the upper level. There are some 85 thousand civillians employed by the MoD. Waaay too many. The procurement process is a known joke even at my level. Read and heard that the MoDs top 20 procurement projects are together 480 months late and over £16bn over budget. That is something like losing £4m a day. That is where the savings should be made in the mod IMO.

To have a deterent you either do properly or not at all. And 4 subs s is the minimum number required. The French do the same with 4 Le Triumphant class SSBNs I think when brown said he would scrap one submarine, I think it was a gesture. That is not saying what submarines that replace the current Vanguard class will be 3 in number with updated refiting requirements to maintain a continuous deterent. But they would not come into service until around 2022/2025.

It needs pardew to almost bring in a new team pardew is clearly bette than wotte but it also shows how hard wotte had it. I doubt even pardew would have kept last seasons team up

Are you really that daft. We have Spent the most have the biggest squad trippled lamberts wages in one go the cost if lambert was pretty much the same as the next 3 top signings in league 1 put together brought in 2 ex league 1 managers as coaches pay pardew bought in a player from serie A brought in jaidi, Harding from the ccc bought a rival captain kept hold of kelvin do I really need to go on about he we have been flexing our financial muscle in league 1 terms?

SOG keane has even said if results do not improve soon he will be out of a job

Been saying this since day 1 of the season. Wa called unrealistic for doing so a few weeks back

In the grand scheme of things. The cost of the actual submarine is small change comapred to the cost of the missiles and warheads. That is why the PM offered to bin one submarine. It was (or seemed) just a gesture. The reason why we have 4 subs to carry the missiles is that 4 is the minimum number needed to maintain a deterent for every minute of the year

Arizona. I'm a bit confused you want a nuclear deterent but are happy to lose one submarine. The number of submarines have no say on the number of nuclear warheads we have. The submarines are just the vehicle used to carry the trident missiles. The missile/warheads are not permenantly on the sub

Have you written Mein Kampf for the rabid right wingers. What other inspiration do you get from hitler?

-15 I think. But they went I'm a daft amount of games winning them one after another it can be done

I went to boundry park in the early 90's when we lost 4-3 in their great escape season. The place is an utter sh1t hole