imsure someone nows..maybe av a look on the NASA website..
mabe it did not go 100% to plan that day and they did not land the module in the exact location and the instruments hadto be placed in an exact location...we will never know.
IF, you are using this as a suggestion that it was faked up then it is pretty weak IMO..
er yes it is actually...... from wiki: Height: 20.9 ft 6.37 m Diameter: 14 ft 4.27 m
Judging by the scale bar the larger crater of the pair directly above the word 'footpath' and bisected by the astronauts footpath is about 10-12m diameter, so it is quite conceivable that there are plenty of boulders that can't be seen in the photo that would need to be walked/bounced/driven around
in your face WSS....
how is that a flip side..
I think the sheep are the nutjobs who are conspiracy theorist where some loser will call a theory and the sheep will follow..many with anti US views..
do the conspiracy theorists own the monopoly on looking into the evidence..? which s what you put across
why would they go in straight lines..?
is there roads and a highway code up there..?
also, im sure we cant see smaller rocks and boulders that might well be in the way of a "straight line" path
I look here, there an everywhere
what i do not accept is tha the echo lifts its stories from here...if they do, it is very few and non event stories to fill the columns