shurlock

It’s textbook and this is from a conservative. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/12/opinion/sunday/if-liberals-hate-him-then-trump-must-be-doing-something-right.html Just goes to show how bankrupt the right is.

He beat Hillary which is a slightly different proposition pal. Let’s see how he fares in November.

The talkceltic forum is probably a better gauge than the views of another millennial wannabe journo.

Fffs

As if it was going to be that easy.

Hahahaha

Yep, though that Swedish attacker looked as confident and composed as Longy.

Good lad. I respect anyone who has the mongboard tenacity to respond to a post that's more than a day old and buried on a previous page.

Harsh pen, though if you go to ground like that, bad things happen.

Martin O'Neill sh*tt*ng all over Neville.

Both nevilles do like to double down.

Good one phil.

Better.

Savage.

Watch it MLG is part of the god squad.

Either liberals like obama are immigrant pandering snowflakes or hypocrites for attacking your boy Trump. Make your mind up fellas

To be clear, Davis covers alot of ground; what I mean is that Armstong is more direct with the ball at his feet whereas Davis relies more on guile.

But he's nothing like Tadic or our AMs. He's a box to box midfielder who likes to drive with the ball and make runs into the box - like a poor man's Lampard. Celtic forum says he would be perfect for Burnley given he works hard in central midfield, so yes his comparison is closer to the players adrian mentions than you assume.

No more cringeworthy than the Jose Fonte song.

In isolation, he sounds like what we would hoped to be getting from PEH or Lemina (though Lemina has flashed more than PEH). Davo is a slightly different player, less of a runner than Armstrong and more of a string-puller. Could easily see a three of Romeu, Lemina and Armstrong. Knowing us we now sell Lemina.

Don’t think he’s in the same class as Davo when he joined us but let’s see where he fits and how he plays.

FIFA's Beast Ratings? Please child behave.

Which starts with skills like mastering the basic rules of grammar and syntax

Jihadi John - how were you the on the money? There is literally no connection between your first sentence - that separated children were being put into this position by their parents and the subsequent story that the separated poster girl was not in fact taken from her parents. You weren't questioning that these incidents were happening - only who was ultimately responsible for them. So wrong again More importantly, now you've changed your position, do you think all these stories are made up? No children have been separated from their parents? After your mini-meltdown about social services, this is closer to the scumbag JJ we've all come to know. Maybe the parents and children are crystal meth mules for the cartels?