Verbal

No, it isn't. I wonder if, as a rabid Corbynista, you can see why it isn't? I've highlighted a rather large clue. (Pop the word 'Jews' in there instead and Bob's your uncle). And no, for the same reason which I doubt you can spot, it isn't at odds with the IHRA definition. Which - despite your swivel-eyed fantasies - does not grant the actions of the Israeli state, especially against the Palestinians, any protections from criticism.

And so it goes on and on. Even St Jeremy's closest allies are saying his feeble handling of rampant Jew-hating in the Labour party has got to stop.

I bet you do.

I can only imagine the seething rage you must feel if you need to get that absurdly personal. My 'paranoia' about anti-Semitism is no doubt fed by the daily diet of anti-Semitic rants emerging from your Corbynista and other Labour bedfellows. Like this one, picked up today, from a Labour councillor called Damien Enticott. He's commenting approvingly on a viciously Jew-hating meme about the 'Jewish ritual' of drinking blood and sucking babies' co cks. Fortunately for you, he qualifies this sickening bullsh it: "This is done only by Talmud Jews. Talmud Jews are parasites! They also believe any child over the 3 years old that isn't a Jew should be treated like a parasite, they believe it is on to even rape that child because it is worthless. To treat a non-Jew decently means that you are as bad as them. All Talmuds need executing!" https://twitter.com/adamlangleben/status/1022795563539095552 Of course, when uproar followed, he denied it all and claimed his account was hacked - but then said this to the Huffington Post: Commenting about “Talmud Jews”, he added: “I share views against some of the stuff that they do, but it’s not something I would express on things like that and it’s not the way that I would express it either.” https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/damien-enticott-labour-facebook-post_uk_5b5b0bfee4b0fd5c73ce9c31 So you tell me. Is this my 'paranoia' - in which case I'll assume you are at least an apologist for this hateful garbage? Or is it something the Labour party should really do something about? Or do you, like Billy Bragg, think it should be the other way around - that Jews 'have work to do' to regain the trust of Saint Jeremy Corbyn? https://twitter.com/NickCohen4/status/1022381509402157061

Or they'll do that weird ad hominem thing. Or look at the list of specialist advisors at the end of article and rage against 'experts'. Or say nobody voted Leave to be better off. Or list 'traitors' who've betrayed the shining glory of Brexit. Anything but address the detail of the arguments themselves. There. A prediction.

For any waverers who think that the label 'jihadists' is invalid for Brexiteer extremists who advocate a 'no deal' scenario, here's a devastating account of what that 'no deal' will actually look like, from the first days after its imposition, to the following weeks and months. Note that these are not predictions in the normal sense of the word. They are a straightforward account of what happens when you apply the rules - or lack of them - implicit in the 'no deal' fantasy. http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2018/07/27/this-is-what-no-deal-brexit-actually-looks-like

No, fanboy, there are plenty of conspiracies. Just not the ones that pre-conclude with the coordinated hivemind of 'MSM', 'deep state' and rich Jews. But I can see why, as a Cobynista, you don't understand that.

You can't really argue with conspiracy theorists of any kind, or in this case a regurgitative acolyte of conspiracy theorists. Trust me, I've tried. They're protected by a hard shell of single-mindedness (dressed up, falsely, as 'open-mindedness'), which at root is an unshakable conviction that major outrages are conducted by a 'deep state' on home soil (9/11 was Americans; 7/7 was Brits; Lee Rigby was - according to the stupidest acolyte - a death faked in collaboration with his own family; the Novichok attack is Porton Down gone rogue, etc). The only exception to the deep state/home soil guff is when the 'Israelis' (code for stinking Jews) are the ultimate culprits. The other key feature is the ranting about the 'MSM', as if it were some sort of coordinated 'establishment'-protecting hivemind - a charge that has led directly to Trump's full-on assault on the news media with his charge of 'fake news'. The attacks on the 'MSM' are invariably made by 'investigators' whose actual investigations take place entirely in their back bedrooms, where incidents and characters are strung together in ways that palely resemble the wall decorations of John Nash's office. But you can't just ignore conspiracy acolytes, sadly. They were once on the marginal fringes of sentience, but now one of them occupies the White House. I see that Trump's most trusted journalist, Alex Jones, is accusing Robert Mueller of being a child rapist, and is making gun-fingers at the screen at the mention of his name. You can bet this accusation will find itself into Trumpworld very soon. 'Pizzagate' - a Trump favourite - led to another 'self-investigating' acolyte loosing off an assault rifle in a falsely accused restaurant in Washington. And journalists now routinely run a gauntlet of vicious abuse at Trump rallies. Here, conspiro-loons also occupy the political left, but the patterns and arguments are exactly the same, down to the relentless scapegoating of what one Corbynista today called 'the Jewish world view'.

This is just out-and-out fabulous. A Tory MEP - a distinctly un-self-aware Brexit Jihadist - has been given space in the Torygraph to propose an update of the Treason Act. https://twitter.com/DCBMEP/status/1022044869081083905 Entertainingly, the Jihadists are really losing their minds over their own failures to implement Brexit, and are descending into a level of bobble-headed, lock-em-all-up extremism no one could possibly have imagined before 23 June 2016.

I'm absolutely not a member of the Labour party JJ.

Thank you Moses. When will that be then, when we start writing history?

Yep. Forgot that one, and there must be dozens more. It's so hard to keep up with all the bullsh it.

A potted history of Brexit Jihadism: 1. Believe the Bus! 2. No one's saying we have the single market! 3. (Let's not even mention the customs union) 4. You'll be swamped by Turkish hordes!! 5. Cake and eat it. 6. Sunny uplands. 7. Project Fear!! 8. To hell with all experts 9. To hell with the Good Friday agreement 10. To hell with the single market 11. To hell with the customs union 12. **** business! 13. Remoaning traitors! With this overflow of rage, I dread to think what happens next.

I've often wondered when a TV programme would be made that would be a 21st century Cathy Come Home. This is it. https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p067bmlh/killed-by-my-debt

What? So your view is that the CIA/FBI/NSA assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election and since is 'laughable' - meaning untrue - and that Putin's non-denial denial is credible? I just want to be clear, so that I fully understand how far over the precipice you've actually gone.

In the end it doesn't matter what we think of him - he's going to Fulham.

Good attempt, but is it really better than wan_kpuffin? Can we have a poll please, mods, on a new moniker for GM?

Did you miss the news from some fu ckwit on here that I'm actually a Corbynista? Still, it's a tough call. Is there anything that Trump has done over the last few days - question the existence of NATO, call the EU 'foes', snuggle up to his RT paymaster Putin - that Corbyn wouldn't have done in his dreams?

The toadys' manifesto to a tee. And all the more imbecilic after Trump's astonishing performance in Helsinki - which even some in the Republican party are calling 'disgusting' and 'disgraceful'.

a sub-human writes.

What else would you expect from the paedophile-led EDL?

Just some friendly advice. Before posting, try reading your guff out loud. It'll help you be less of a co ckwomble. Maybe.

Spooky...

Ok, quick game of whack-a-twunt: Yes, you’re right. Despite everything I’ve been saying over the last three years about Corbyn and his gang of conspiracy theorists, Putin fans and Jew haters, I’m a secret Corbynista. Brilliant. Why are they ‘so-called’? This is the alt-right logic at work (logic is a strong word applied to you, but let’s roll with it). People with opposing views don’t need to be engaged because they are exhibiting bad faith. You’ll find this dismissal of all alternative views as hypocritically held common with your friends on the alt-right. You sound like a lo-fi Milo, down to the desperate neediness in insisting on the last word. It is, Lord Crap! Living Marxism self-destructed when it peddled a conspiracy theory that the ITN footage of the Srebrenica victims was fake. ITN bankrupted tehm in a libel action. Subsequently, they went full Trumpian alt-right tilt, railing against the scientific ‘conspiracy’ of global warming, ‘political correctness’ and any limitations whatever on free speech, no matter what damage it does. This kind of journey isn’t that unusual – see Mussolini for more details.

A site supposedly obsessed with free speech decries examples of free speech. It's also a site that tries hard to conceal its miserable alt-right leanings. I wonder why you like it?