Jump to content

Donatello

Members
  • Posts

    1,553
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Donatello

  1. Yes, but they clearly wouldn't be doing it lightly. Given that permission was given for RK to move/talk, it seems plausible that Everton/RK aren't providing us with assurances we want...and *that* may be worth paying millions for. P.S Thanks, KBilly.
  2. You're on a wind-up (if it wasn't already obvious), that's likely the third time you've posed such a question without actually elaborating.
  3. Is that how it/I came across?
  4. I'm not too sure many are suggesting Saints are bigger than Everton (whatever that means anyway). I think most would agree that there are 6 big clubs in the league, Man United, Man City, Arsenal, Chelsea, Spurs, and finally, Liverpool....and then there's the rest of us....which includes Everton.
  5. With respect, outside of Everton FC (I.e. its supporters), no one gives a f*ck (and I'm not saying that to be cruel/petty). And I'm not sure you could get more trivial than that list anyway....dugouts At any rate, Koeman hasn't signed for any of the reasons you listed, so it's something of a mute point.
  6. This. It's quite pathetic really.
  7. How are Everton going to work £100m net spend through their accounts without incurring UEFA sanctions?
  8. City were fined £50m (or something like that), and I'm almost certain they had restrictions on their European playing squad. But yes, there are ways around it, however, that'll depend on inflated sponsorship deals and so on (I haven't the foggiest when their current deals expire, but I can't imagine that they all do so this year). Where's Redslo when you need him?
  9. How do you envisage that they're going to deal with FFP? Their revenue is similar to ours :S
  10. Said in jest, don't worry (you're not, but y'know what I mean)
  11. I thought he was too Dutch for you?
  12. *without wanting to expose myself as a stalker
  13. Without wishing to sound like a stalker, KBilly has recently been viewing this thread
  14. Wouldn't a potential new stadium be years and years from completion anyway? Would that really be a factor?
  15. Utter nonsense (...but then I'm not the least bit surprised).
  16. I think the £8m 'exceptional costs' may also include bonuses, but don't quote me on that
  17. This And it's worth mentioning (for those interested) that a figure of £72m places (or placed...given that the information pertains to the 14/15 season) us 12th in the wages paid stakes.
  18. Fingers crossed it's a two year extension, I.e. would serve another two years before entering the last 12 months. Four years of one manager is no mean feat
  19. Take the interview at face value and get on with your lives I'm not sure how anyone can take too much umbrage with what was said, it all seems reasonable enough. Point to the Clyne interview by all means, but that doesn't negate the fact that what Reed said was perfectly valid.
  20. Ta\Thanks. Got lost in all the pictures/advertisements.
  21. Sorry, where does it indicate that exactly? Evidently I've left my reading glasses at home.
  22. He's only put in one cross (which was blocked), hasn't he? Rose, that is. Kyle Walker has had a far better game than Rose.
×
×
  • Create New...