Guided Missile

Denmark recently voted in a Conservative government, sensibly...

Just used Google translate to convert this into Chinese then back into English. This is what I got: Not all Conservatives heads..there Nob many who know what society . General Motors has just spray a few waves as a class struggle sound like a snob , let me think of a return to the language of the 1970s Slightly better but still makes no sense. Like they say, you need a license to own a dog, but anyone can have internet access.

More comedy gold. I guess what you are saying is that Stalin declared war on Hitler, in which over 20 million Soviets were killed, because they were both "right-wing totalitarian mentalists". Waits for Hockey_saint to reply with a post stating that Hitler, whilst parading as a right-wing totalitarian mentalist was probably more of a communist).

Just for my own enjoyment, I hope you don't mind if I copy your gem. I have never posted a turd yet, so I just want to know what it feels like. Here we go. Straining. Ooooh, push hard. Gasp. Go on, GM If Tony Blair is an example of a Socialist politician, then Stalin is an example of a Conservative politician. That is quite possibly the biggest turd of a post I have ever seen. Well done Hockey_saint! Please don't stop providing inspiration, because you're well on your way to becoming a forum legend. Hopefully a mod will flush this down the forum toilet, because it smells just reading it....

I would write a response, but in a battle of wits, I hate to fight an unarmed opponent. Stalin an example of conservatism? Priceless....

My lesson was based on 30 years of running a business and I can tell you that any business, when faced with paying £18,000 a year for a 21 year old or the same for a 25 year old, all things being equal, would chose the 25 year old, all day long, leaving the 21 year old out of work. 25 year olds are more likely to need the minimum wage, as well, given the drop in teenage pregnancies the benefit cap will cause. God knows why you think that lessons are only learnt by either indoctrination or reading is beyond me. What a strange thought. Experience is a wonderful thing and what new technological discoveries are based on.

Tony Blair’s was arguably to the left of where Ed Miliband was, as follows: 1. Blair didn’t want to cut benefits for unemployed young people. 2. Blair supported a higher rate of tax on corporate profits than Miliband. 3. Blair supported renationalising the railways while in opposition. 4. Blair was more positive about immigration. 5. Blair imposed a windfall tax on privatised energy companies. 6. Blair pledged to scrap the market system imposed on the NHS. 7. Blair wanted regional government to be democratically elected. 8. Blair advocated lower university tuition fees than Miliband. 9. Blair flirted with putting ordinary workers into company boardrooms. 10. Blair didn’t support a freeze on public sector pay. 11. Blair left Labour with a stronger link to the trade unions. Oh, and I forgot to add, he was an even greater hypocritical, champagne swigging, expenses addicted, wealthy, ex-public schoolboy than Milliband, who, like all Marxist ideologues will also be grabbing money as soon as he can. Neither of them can compare to the ultimate leftie of the Labour party, that old ginger windbag, Kinnock, who, with his wife have hoovered up more public money than any other failed politician I can remember and trained his son in the same caper. At least Tories aren't dishonest about wanting to accumulate money. It's just that they generally do it by building something of value, like a business that employs people, not sponging off the taxpayer...and don't get me started on that ex-waiter and now Lord John Prescott or the awful John Bercow. Slime bags and apparently not ashamed of it... Socialism in action? They are mugging you all off, as is the case in Scotland. Still the morons that vote these sh !ts in will get the MP's they deserve. The rest of us just lucky they are not allowed to spend our money any more...

That's why Tony Blair has £60M in the bank, then... No, everyone wants to be rich, even just to give it to charitable causes. Those that haven't got the brains or talent to become rich, simply say they hate it, but it's simply envy.

Not sure what argument you're trying to make but it seems to involve me being a nobhead and that you won't support a party whose policies you agree with. Like most of the vanishing breed of socialists, you're trapped in a world of dogma and class prejudice. You're just lucky that ignorance is bliss...

I think you're a budget behind. That was from the 2014 Autumn statement. Read this and weep for Labour. They've been trumped: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/budget-2015-george-osborne-promises-8bn-more-annual-funding-for-nhs-by-2020-10375397.html

A minor lesson in practical economics. If the minimum wage was raised to £9 for 21-24 year olds, youth unemployment would rocket. Still, when you're on Planet Corbyn where economics is based on beliefs, not financial reality, then you'd put up with high youth unemployment. Socialism always thrives on discontent and an opposition Labour party and their whore masters, Unite, would love that.

They're right. The Conservative Party will double childcare hours to 30, increase the minimum wage to £9 by 2020, guaranteed an £8 billion increase in spending per year above inflation by 2020 for the NHS and promised to invest £18bn in building new schools. Let's face it, in one budget the Labour Party has had the midfield snatched from it and only have the left touchline to run up and down, while complaining to the lino. I don't see them scoring many goals that way...

Oh, and read this, as well...

You almost had me, up to this point...

A real working class hero, then...

Just a quick heads up. You may not have noticed, but the "class" system is finally dead in the UK. Apart from dinosaurs like you, no one gives a sh! t about it any more. It's been replaced by the social mobility the Tories offered voters at the last election. The only mobility offered by Labour was of the downward variety.

I take no money from the charity I am chairman of, even for expenses. I just happen to think that's unethical.

Oooh, a champagne socialist...a vanishing breed as most of them can't live with the hypocrisy, any more. Socialists in this country will slowly morph into Democrats, as they have in the US, where self made wealth is something to be admired, not resented and envied, and their politics are almost indistinguishable from the Republicans. Socialist politics isn't dying, just the politics of envy.

You know more about whine than wine...

Pity Tony Blair doesn't have your ethics...worth over £60M at the last count and much of it off the backs of impoverished third world countries, like South Sudan. Don't you just love these champagne socialists?

You can never be too rich. Now, haven't you got an allotment to look after?

I'm assuming that when you get this £150k from the taxpayer, you'll be donating it to those worse off than you...

I know and it only cost me £3. Jezbollah all the way...

You're wasting your breath. You have to ask yourself that if these lefties are so smart, why aren't they rich?

Thank Christ you're not in the work force any more...although the worry is that you get a vote.